Epstein Secrets

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement) (emphasis supplied); Hawkins v. United States, 358 U.S. 74, 79 (1958) ("[T]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to

ult, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct' United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 404 (1980), quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 438 U.S..422, 445 (1978).7 The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted this language to require that the illegal activity be the dominant motive f

the funds in the Cayman Islands bank. Having thus determined what had hap- pened in 1980, the magistrate turned to the 1985 tax evasion indictment. Stephen Sny- der, the Justice Department's Criminal Tax Division attorney responsible for the inves- tigation of the government's case and its presentation

de- termined under provisions of old Bail Act, even after its repeal, where bail application had first been considered under provisio of old Act); United States Gypsum Co. . Uhlhorn, 232 F.Supp. 994, 1 (E.D.Ark.1964), aff'd,366 F.2d 211 (8th Cir.I966), cert. denied,385 U.S. 1026, S.Ct. 753, 17 L.Ed.2d 674 (1967)

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis supplied); Hawkins' United States, 358 U.S. 74, 79 (1958) ("[T]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to fa

result, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct." United Stalest Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 404 (1980), quoting United States' United States Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422, 445 (1978).7 The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted this language to require that the illegal activity be the dominant motive f