Epstein Secrets

ximum number of non-treatment drug tests, *1220 thereby impermissibly delegating that authort to Torres' probation officer. See United States Stephens, 424 F.3d 876, 881 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that "a probation officer may not decide the ... extent of the punishment imposed," because " [u]nder o

bmit, the court erred when it failed to state the maximum number of non-treatment drug tests the probation officer could impose"). Unlike in Stephens, where the district court expressly delegated the authority to set a maximum number of non-treatment drug tests to the probation officer, id at 87

rt hereof; that said letter and communication was duly carried by the United States mail for de- livery into the City and County of San Francisco, Southern Division of the North- ern District of California, according to the direction thereon." The exhibited letter plainly threatens injury to the addressee Joe

on and bolsters the conclusion that Fisher's tax return is entitled to protection from disclosure by the Government in this action. See Richards I Stephens. 118 F.R.D. 338, 339 (S.D.N.Y.1988) § 6103 is intended to protect the confidentiality of taxpayers' returns by " regulat[ing] ... disclosure of ta

S, et al., Plaintiff, I ST. MARY'S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.AW—02-2449. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. June 13, 2003. Landowner brought action against county commissioners and individuals for violations of due process rights and a tak- ing under t

San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. Lloyd H. Burke, U. S. Atty., Richard H. Foster, Ant. U. S. Atty., San Fran- cisco, Cat, for appellee. Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. Ege, Boyd and Bruno have run afoul of the Mann Act.' A young California girl who

States District ord in this case is sufficient to support Court for the Northern District of Call- the conviction of the defendant Cousins fognia, Southern Division, Michael J. on the conspiracy count; and since a per- Roche, J., rendered judgment, and de- son cannot conspire with himself or her- fendant appea