Epstein Secrets

al under the current pandemic situation is just not realistic. It is not meaningful. It is not fair. And I should say, as your Honor noted, in the Stephens case, we are not faulting the Bureau of Prisons. We are not faulting the Marshal Service. We understand they are doing the best they can under the

limits in the early instances your access to the client. It is complicated by the COVID crisis and the other factors your Honor has pointed out in Stephens and in Williams-Bethea, and so it is very hard for us to pull together this financial information, and we have done it as quickly as we could befor

ISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: New York, N.Y. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) x Teleconference Arraignment Bail Hearing July 14, 2020 3:05 p.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge APPEARANCES AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys

rpts from the May 26, 2016 deposition of 12 Dr. Stephen Olsen. The material relating to plaintiff's 13

GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCS: DATE FILED:7/30/2020 PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) x ALISON J. NATHAN, United States District Judge: WHEREAS the Government intends to produce to GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, certain documents and materials that

l may make an appropriate application to the Court for any such modifications. SO ORDERED: Dated: New York, New York July 30 , 2020 HONORABLE ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge 12 EFTA00076410 CaSeatilSth-Q-092I313€1AFtielitotuniftial030,F21183161032CgeNtgelEbf2 App.-0803 UNITED STATES DIS

17 of 31 subject to the weight of federal power are always a special concern of the judiciary." Chandler, 2020 WL 1528120, at *2; United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 65-67 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (finding that "the obstacles the current public health crisis poses to the preparation of the Defendant's de

d prepare for her defense will be significantly impaired and she will not be able to meaningfully participate in the preparation of her defense. In Stephens, the Court found that this factor required the defendant's release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), which provides for temporary release based on a determ

ISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: New York, N.Y. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) x Teleconference Arraignment Bail Hearing July 14, 2020 3:05 p.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge BY: APPEARANCES United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys COHEN & GRESSER

on documents) with Ms. Maxwell and will further compromise her ability to prepare her defense. Moreover, as this Court observed in United States v. Stephens, if an outbreak occurs "substantial medical and security challenges would almost certainly arise." Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d at 65. We urge the Cour

inly arise." Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d at 65. We urge the Court to weigh the threat of COVID as a factor favoring release in this case, as it did in Stephens. CONCLUSION Ghislaine Maxwell is committed to defending herself and wants nothing more than to remain in this country, with her family and friends

America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 1SDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 12/28/20 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in ill

. 2020). But at least one other federal district court has recently considered and granted pretrial release under that section. See United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63,66-68 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (Nathan, J.); but see Alderete, 336 F.R.D. at 268. 11 EFTA00093420 CaszEsc'. 27-U412[9496W ntCldeanik4

ates of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 3/22/21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in ill