Epstein Secrets

, 4:01 p.m. (Thereupon, a recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on the video record, 4:04 p.m. (Thereupon, Kenneth A. Sweder, Esquire, Alan M. Dershowitz and Carolyn Cohen left the proceedings.) ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 420 MR, SCAROLA: The record should reflect that Mr. and Mrs.

fy sealing these presumptively-public documents. L DERSHOWITZ HAS NOT JUSTIFIED SEALING ALLEGED DEFAMATORY RECO

e to speak up. MR. SCOTT: You're going to have to speak up a little bit more, Counsel. MR. INDYKE: Objection. This is Darren Indyke. Anything that Alan might have to say to that, to the extent they are covered under conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, privileged under attorney-client privileges as

UIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 mention Professor Dershowitz's name once. A. I said flight logs. And let's ta

_ professional reputation. Carnegie recited subsection vi’s restriction on release of materials involving a privacy right, but noted that “statements Tedder alleged were defamatory and damaging were allegations in Carnegie's counterclaim for which she seeks damages. These matters were not peripheral to th

terials is “inherent” in the case itself. The principle that defamatory material in a defamation case cannot be sealed is recognized in Carnegie v. Tedder, 698 So.2d 1310 (2d DCA 1997). Carnegie involved a claim and counterclaim between two parties (Carnegie and Tedder), one of whom alleged that disclo

ateneed on which the era Or problem aFpeated. - Fri:ideyour name ad scorn number Gif eery) - Dew& the error or the trandef you revere about, and *Alain as clay as you cal why you believe t is Amer a why you need more nfamaten. - km:dethe doer arrant d the suspected ant. The Firm or Card Issuer vi

Semites gamest tezdates this alternation as il is retested, the him does not provide any assunrces drat the ithamatim coder 'Cost buis° and *Unwell:Tedder/lose is accurate as of the date of thee statement. As such please do not mkt on this nfamthion to make puthase ix sale decisions for tax purposes

looseleaf service updated annually). 3A Charles Alan Wright, Federa 1 Practice and Procedure SS 761-7

Cir. 1985). nited Stata Hazime, 762 F.2d 34, 37 (6th Cir. 1985); United States Mauro, 648 F. Supp. 316, 318 (D.D.C. 1986); see also United States Tedder, 903 F. Supp. 344, 345 (N.D.N.Y. 1995). Burden of Proof At Detention Hearing: In a pretrialdetendon hearing, the government's burden is to establi

IRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ’S REDACTED MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Defenda

! JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, V. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY JANE DOE NO. 3 Non-party Jane Doe 3, by and through unde

Cassell had something to hide. Accordingly, Dershowitz has failed to carry his heavy burden to justify sealing these presumptively-public documents. L DERSHOWITZ HAS NOT JUSTIFIED SEALING ALLEGED DEFAMATORY RECORDS THAT ARE INTEGRAL TO THIS DEFAMATION CASE. In his motion, Dershowitz never recounts the heavy b