Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00183935_sub_001 - EFTA00183935_100

4 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

nly to see then-State Attorney Barry Krischer kick the case to a grand jury Mr. Krischer backed off when one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted MySpace comments about their alco- hol and marijuana use. Epsteinb "best" defense has been that he

en one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted

ff when one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims h

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22 — p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he ha

EFTA00233329_sub_003 - EFTA00233329_300

4 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

y to see then-State Attorney Barry Krischer kick the case to a grand jury. Mr. Krischer backed off when one of Epstein's gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted MySpace comments about their alco- hol and marijuana use. Epstein% "best" defense has been that he

n one of Epstein's gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted

f when one of Epstein's gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims h

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22— p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he had

EFTA02729297

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

h Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, et al., 2

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22 —p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he had