Epstein Secrets

dissatisfied with that result. . . . . [You], Professor Dershowitz, former Solicitor [General] Starr, former United

William Clinton, Donald Trump, Kevin Spacey, and Alan Dershowitz, and other “prominent businessmen, aca

han two months[] ago, it has become clear that several attorneys on your legal team are dissatisfied with that result. . . . . [You], Professor Dershowitz, former Solicitor [General] Starr, former United States Attorney Lewis, Ms. Sanchez and Messrs. Black, Goldberger and Lefcourt previously had the o

nvestigation, identified him as a wealthy Palm Beach resident with influential contacts, including William Clinton, Donald Trump, Kevin Spacey, and Alan Dershowitz, and other “prominent businessmen, academics and scientists.”210 Villafaña, Lourie, Sloman, and Acosta learned of this press coverage early in the

sued a Notice of Hearing, setting the case for January 4, 2008.150 E. Epstein Seeks Departmental Review of the NPA’s § 2255 Provision Relating to Monetary Damages for the Victims With Epstein’s plea hearing delayed, he launched a new effort to undermine the validity of the NPA, this time within the Departm

who was a former Palm Beach County Assistant State Attorney, and by nationally prominent Harvard Law School professor and criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz, who was a self- described close friend of Epstein. After initial plea negotiations with the State Attorney’s Office, Epstein replaced the local at

minors. 15 told OPR that Epstein’s local counsel brought attorney Alan Dershowitz to see Krischer and the Assistant State Attorney, but Dershowitz was “overly aggressive” and threatened, “We’re going to destroy your witnesses; don’t go to court because we’re going to destroy those girls.” Acco

aw School professor and criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz, who was a self- described close frien

AO’s Actions .................................................................99 4. Acosta Attempts to Revise the NPA § 2255 Language concerning Monetary Damages, but the Defense Does Not Accept It .......................100 5. January 7, 2008: Acosta and Sloman Meet with Sanchez, Who Makes Additional A

in the case." 27 EFTA00205650 See I3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

k and the District of New Jersey are already available to prosecutors and grand juries in those districts. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(A)-(C). 4. Monetary Damages Petitioners argue that they are entitled to the following forms of monetary relief: • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Offi

cket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey are already available to prosecutors and grand juries in those districts. See 4. Monetary Damages Petitioners argue that they are entitled to the following forms of monetary relief: • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Offi

cket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey are already available to prosecutors and grand juries in those districts. See 4. Monetary Damages Petitioners argue that they are entitled to the following forms of monetary relief: • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Offi

ocket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See 13A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey are already available to prosecutors and grand juries in those districts. See 4. Monetary Damages Petitioners argue that they are entitled to the following forms of monetary relief: • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Offi

n the case." 27 EFTA00208849 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey are already available to prosecutors and grand juries in those districts. See 4. Monetary Damages Petitioners argue that they are entitled to the following forms of monetary relief: • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Offi