Epstein Secrets

lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11420-11426 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20201-20204 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client priv

ected by privacy rights 01808-01809 09/10/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley J. Edwards Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- KAM Doe v. Epstein - Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of th

sonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11420-11426 08/24/2009 Attorneys at Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

sonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20201-20204 08/24/2009 Attorneys at Serving Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

s 11420-11426 08/24/2009 Attorneys at Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client priv

f the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01808-01809 09/10/2009 I Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- KAM Doe v. Epstein - Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of th

er & Coleman Lead Counsel Paul G. Cassell Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. C

0811-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2609 Page 3 of 6 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File a Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay And Or Continue 6. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstance

FL 33160 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 2

RRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEItItEY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PROPOSED ORDER This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply to Plaintiffs' Jane Does 2-7 EFTA00727465 Case 9:08-cy-80119-KAM Document 123-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 4 of 5 Re