f the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01808-01809 09/10/2009 I Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- KAM Doe v. Epstein - Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of th

0811-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2609 Page 3 of 6 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File a Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay And Or Continue 6. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstance

RRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEItItEY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PROPOSED ORDER This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply to Plaintiffs' Jane Does 2-7 EFTA00727465 Case 9:08-cy-80119-KAM Document 123-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 4 of 5 Re

,00/hr $325 00thr $24.00 $97.50 06/19/2012 CK Preparation of Motion for extension of lime. 0.90 $325.00/ir $292.50 Proofread/ edit/ prepare Motion for Extension of Time by Wnich to Fie Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, and 08/20/2012 NM proposed Order, TC's with C. Kroblin, Esq. re. same; TC with 1.00 $8

ected by privacy rights 01808-01809 09/10/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley J. Edwards Activity in case 9:08-cv-80119- KAM Doe v. Epstein - Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of th