Epstein Secrets

ion. Sixth, plaintiff argues that Mr. Epstein should be required to appear personally to answer questions regarding his relationship with Professor Dershowitz on the off chance that it might prove admissible and even though she has herself moved to exclude information about Prof. Dershowitz from the trial

answer questions regarding his relationship with Professor Dershowitz on the off chance that it might prove admissible

IN By his attorneys, 8 EFTA00589517 /s/ Jack Alan Goldberger Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbuiy, Gold

so that she can obtain adverse inferences against defendant Maxwell. Response at 7-8. As Mr. Epstein 5 EFTA00589514 has already contended in his Motion to Quash, the adverse inference issues can be decided by the Court based on Mr. Epstein's deposition testimony, and nothing will be added to the inquiry by

ICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, CASE NO.: 15-000072 Plaintiff(s), JUDGE: LYNCH v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. I MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER DENYING NON- PARTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENA Jeffrey Epstein (her

000072 Plaintiff(s), JUDGE: LYNCH v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. I MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF TH

NO.: 15-000072 Plaintiff(s), JUDGE: LYNCH v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. I MOTION FOR RECONSI

a. 1st DCA 2004). In the case at hand, the Subpoena Duces Tecum with which Epstein was served, which was attached as Exhibit B to Epstein's initial Motion to Quash, states thereon that it is "to be served at an alternate location." Ostensibly, Edwards was well aware at the time he had Epstein court- ordered to

ion. Sixth, plaintiff argues that Mr. Epstein should be required to appear personally to answer questions regarding his relationship with Professor Dershowitz on the off chance that it might prove admissible and even though she has herself moved to exclude information about Prof. Dershowitz from the trial

answer questions regarding his relationship with Professor Dershowitz on the off chance that it might prove admissible

ed, JEFFREY EPSTEIN By his attorneys, is/ Jack Alan Goldberger Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury, Gold

appear personally so that she can obtain adverse inferences against defendant Maxwell. Response at 7-8. As Mr. Epstein has already contended in his Motion to Quash, the adverse inference issues can be decided by the Court based on Mr. Epstein's deposition testimony, and nothing will be added to the inquiry by