so that she can obtain adverse inferences against defendant Maxwell. Response at 7-8. As Mr. Epstein 5 EFTA00589514 has already contended in his Motion to Quash, the adverse inference issues can be decided by the Court based on Mr. Epstein's deposition testimony, and nothing will be added to the inquiry by

a. 1st DCA 2004). In the case at hand, the Subpoena Duces Tecum with which Epstein was served, which was attached as Exhibit B to Epstein's initial Motion to Quash, states thereon that it is "to be served at an alternate location." Ostensibly, Edwards was well aware at the time he had Epstein court- ordered to

appear personally so that she can obtain adverse inferences against defendant Maxwell. Response at 7-8. As Mr. Epstein has already contended in his Motion to Quash, the adverse inference issues can be decided by the Court based on Mr. Epstein's deposition testimony, and nothing will be added to the inquiry by