Epstein Secrets

, 4:01 p.m. (Thereupon, a recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on the video record, 4:04 p.m. (Thereupon, Kenneth A. Sweder, Esquire, Alan M. Dershowitz and Carolyn Cohen left the proceedings.) ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 420 MR, SCAROLA: The record should reflect that Mr. and Mrs.

fy sealing these presumptively-public documents. L DERSHOWITZ HAS NOT JUSTIFIED SEALING ALLEGED DEFAMATORY RECO

e to speak up. MR. SCOTT: You're going to have to speak up a little bit more, Counsel. MR. INDYKE: Objection. This is Darren Indyke. Anything that Alan might have to say to that, to the extent they are covered under conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, privileged under attorney-client privileges as

UIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 mention Professor Dershowitz's name once. A. I said flight logs. And let's ta

ounting the overarching principle that “t]he public shall have access to all records of the judicial branch of government, except as provided below.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(a). This rule is a codification of the Florida Supreme Court’s admonition that a “a strong presumption of openness exists for all court

makes no sense. . On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Martin G. Weinberg < wrote: I intend to strongly discourage this, no upside to you, no upside to alan, will not be helpful before he was your attorney, will threaten privilege after From: jeffrey E. Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 6:55 PM To: Ala

lan, will not be helpful before he was your attorney, will threaten privilege after From: jeffrey E. Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 6:55 PM To: Alan Dershowitz Cc: Kendell Coffey (new) ; Martin G Weinberg ; Ken Sweder ; Harvey Silverglate • Mr. Mark Fabiani Subject: Re: Bradley Edwards v. Epstein this cas

itz Cc: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>, "William B. King" Brad Edwards "Mary E. Pirrotta" < > Subject: Bradley Edwards v. Epstein Dear Mr. Dershowitz: Statements attributed to you in the public media express a willingness, indeed a strong desire, to submit to questioning under oath regarding your

e Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipien

From: Jack Scarola [JSX& Sent: Monday, January 05,2015 4:59 PM To: Alan Dershowitz Subject: Re: Scarola Dear Mr. Dershowitz: It will be unproductive to debate by email either past history regarding our efforts to depose you, th

From: Jack Scarola [JSX& Sent: Monday, January 05,2015 4:59 PM To: Alan Dershowitz Subject: Re: Scarola Dear Mr. Dershowitz: It will be unproductive to debate by email either past history regarding our efforts to depose you, the merits of your unfiled public relations "d

JSX& Sent: Monday, January 05,2015 4:59 PM To: Alan Dershowitz Subject: Re: Scarola Dear Mr. Dersh

e Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

ctice of law throughout the State of Florida and beyond. 8. Despite having previously been the victim of character assassination by the Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S associate and client, Jeffrey Epstein, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS enjoys a highly favorable national reputation particularly related to his work in defendi

ims of sexual abuse. 2 EFTA00188846 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM uucument 291-10 Entered on FLSD L.....Ket 01/21/2015 Page 4 of 7 Edwards and Cassell. Dershowitz Complaint 9. Before entering the private practice of law, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS was a trial attorney at the Broward County State Attorney's Office r

If you would let me know what non-privileged information you would seek from me, I would then be able to decide whether to cooperate. Sincerely, Alan ershowitz EFTA00188853 EFTA00188854 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Locument 291-12 Entered on FLSD D.—Ket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 13 EFTA00188

e Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

d Coleman <MINIM > To: Jack Scarola ca, "Thomas E. Scott" Cassell <cassell aw.utah.edu>, "Mary E. Pirrotta" "Jack Goldberger" CC: Subject: RE: Dershowitz Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:35:11 +0000 Importance: high a a , Paul , Mary Boija Brad Edwards Good morning Jack: Our "position" regarding Mr.

he Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510- 2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

each Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atter:bury, Goldberger & Weiss

he Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

MINIM > To: Jack Scarola E Pirrotta" Brad Edwards , . , Mary Bo 'a , Jack Goldberger , Paul Cassell , "Mary CC: "Thomas E. Scott" Subject: RE: Dershowitz Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:08:18 +0000 Mr. Scarola I again request that you please provide dates on which you are available for UMC on our Motion to

ommunication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510- EFTA00674254 2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing

Counsel for Defendant J6ffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

to motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (cX9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954.. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing of

Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing