Epstein Secrets

Miami Herald published the first in a series of articles that incl erences to Dershowitz's alleged sexual abuse o (Compl. at ¶ 13). In response, Dershowitz ma e a number of statements nein the alleged abuse took place and questioning lotives. Dershowitz said, "[T]he story was 100% flatly categorically

able interlocutors' and there is as a matter of law no new audience to reach, and no new cause of action accrues." (Reply Memorandum In Support Of Alan Dershowitz's Motion To Dismiss Complaint ("Def. Dismiss Rep."), dated July 16, 2019 [dkt. no. 40], at 4 citing !' Clark 617 F. App'x. at 506) (emphasis added).

nd informing him, "If there is anything I Sires says that on January 22, 2015, the same day he can do for you, please let me know." (Declaration of Alan initially contacted Dershowitz offering assistance, Sires Dershowitz ("Dershowitz Deer), dated June 7, 2019 spoke telephonically with Dershowitz a

enials destroyed the plaintiffs reputation, then Professor Dershowitz's worldwide rebuke, you say, destroyed her reputa

d accused in such a cases, or it must not protect either." (Mot. Dismiss at 21). While as a matter of ultimate law this may well be correct, that Dcrshowitz was always free to sue if he felt aggrieved by what he views as her false and defamatory statements about him. But the Federal Rules of Civil Pro

. Court ex rel. County of Clark, 118 Nev. 140, 42 P.3d 233, 239 (2002). In a case related to this one, the Court's dear departed colleague, Judge Robert W. Sweet, held that because the qualified privilege of reply is an affirmative defense that a plaintiff has a right to rebut, it is not appropriate for res

ID LEBOWITZ DOUGLAS E. LIEB ALANNA KAUFMAN EMMA L. FREEMAN DAVID BERMAN ASHOK CHANDRAN DANIEL TRUMAN This firm represents Intervenor Professor Alan M. Dershowitz, and we write to alert the Court to certain troubling developments concerning the treatment of materials subject to this Court's orders, and to see

y leaked to members of the press. We believe that these materials, which repeat provably-false and defamatory alleSof sexual misconduct against Mr. Dershowitz, were leaked by persons associated with Roberts ("Ms. Roberts"), the plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. Once again, Mr. Dershowitz — who ha

TRUMAN This firm represents Intervenor Professor Alan M. Dershowitz, and we write to alert the Court t

ELIZABETH S. SAYLOR KATHERINE ROSENFELD DEBRA L. CiRE.ENBERGER ZOE SALZMAN SAM SHAPIRO By ECF EMERY CELLI BRINCICERHOFF & ABADY LLP Honorable Robert W. Sweet United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 FIFTH AVENUE. AT ROCKEFF.U.

CasCear:qgQxgota3g4.9SaaleI3bginleAFM04lelfig§k)1$12eaMbesf1laf 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -against- ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. No. 19 Civ. 3377 (LAP) No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) MEMORANDUM & ORDER L

(LAP) MEMORANDUM & ORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court is a request by Defendant Alan Dershowitz ("Mr. Dershowitz") to modify the protective order entered in v. Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (S.D.N.Y.), to permit him "all filings and discovery materials, including

T COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -against- ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff,

s of the Maxwell protective order. 1. The Maxwell Protective Order At the heart of the dispute is the protective order entered in Maxwell by Judge Robert W. Sweet. (See Protective Order (the "Maxwell Protective Order"), dated March 17, 2016 [dkt. no. 62 in 15 Civ. 7433].)2 1 (See tesponse to Dershowitz Lette

v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellee, v. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 16-3945-cv(L) No. 17-1625 (CON) No. 17-1722(CON) ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA, Intervenors-Appellants, EFTA00092308 V. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWE

roup, PLLC, Hartford, CT, for Intervenor- Appellant Michael Cernovich. JOSE A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Intervenors-Appellants Alan M. Dershowitz ("Dershowitz"), Michael Cemovich ("Cemovich"), and the Miami Herald Company (with reporter Julie Brown, jointly the "Herald") appeal from certain orders of the

-3945-cv(L) No. 17-1625 (CON) No. 17-1722(CON) ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH

mi Herald Company (with reporter Julie Brown) appeal from certain orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge) denying their respective motions to unseal filings in a defamation suit. We conclude that the ' The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the

Firm, PC APFAlk Cc: Gary H. Baise, Esq. By; Alan P. Fraade 2 EFTA00601556

s of America v. Steven Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS), 95 Cr. 321 (RWS), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2394 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 1997) ("Hoffenberg"). Honorable Robert W. Sweet, D.J. was presiding Judge in Hoffenberg, in which Mr. Hoffenberg was convicted of conspiracy to violate securities laws by fraudulently selling secu

redacted submissions. It did not request that the district court transmit any unredacted or sealed court submissions. Appeal No. 16-3945. Appellant Dershowitz moved to unseal various documents in August 2016; the district court denied the motion in November 2016. Appellant Cernovich moved to unseal the su

Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 303.831.7364; [email protected] 801.585.5202; [email protected] Court- Judge/ Agency appealed from: Hon. Robert W. Sweet, District Judge (S.D.N.Y.) Please check appropriate boxes: Has movant notified posing counsel (required by Local Rule 27.1): {} Yes No (explain)