Epstein Secrets

15 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87203, * For Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenor: Jacqueline Perczek, Roy Eric Black, Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL. For Alan M. Dershowitz, Intervenor: Kendall Brindley r21 Coffey, LEAD ATTORNEY, Gabriel Groisman, Coffey Burlington, P.L., Miami, FL; Steven Russell Safra, Thomas E. Scot

bnick Kornspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL. For Alan M. Dershowitz, Intervenor: Kendall Brindley r21 Coffey, LEAD AT

lack Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL. For Alan M. Dershowitz, Intervenor: Kendall Brindley r21 C

ican, The May 8, 2017 Monday FINDING FAKE NEWS BYLINE: William F Jasper SECTION: Pg. 23 Vol 33 No. 9 ISSN: 08856540 LENGTH: 827 words DATELINE: Appleton FULL TEXT For internal use only SDNY_GM_00059505 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0022329 EFTA_00 I 70055 EFTA01296723

the Democratic lawyer who once worked for Al Gore but who has been criticized for the methods he used to defend Theranos, will once again confront Alan Dershowitz, the intellectual bulwark on O.J. Simpson's defense team, in a separate legal fight over Epstein's actions. From Tom Jackman, Deanna Paul and Manu

ein. has alleged that Epstein demanded that she have sex with him repeatedly when she was underage and lent her for sex to his friends, including Dershowitz. ... Dershowitz's effort to counter the accusations has been made all the more nettlesome because his long-ago representation of Epstein Page 1293

sed to defend Theranos, will once again confront Alan Dershowitz, the intellectual bulwark on O.J. Sim

itude toward people of color, his approach to immigrants detained at the border, his answers to violence in American cities, and on and on. But in Appleton, Wis., the Rev. Dennis Episcopo hasn't felt the need as a religious leader to denounce any of it in front of his congregation, which includes more

the Democratic lawyer who once worked for Al Gore but who has been criticized for the methods he used to defend Theranos, will once again confront Alan Dershowitz, the intellectual bulwark on O.J. Simpson's defense team, in a separate legal fight over Epstein's actions. From Tom Jackman, Deanna Paul and Manu

tein. has alleged that Epstein demanded that she have sex with him repeatedly when she was underage and lent her for sex to his friends, including Dershowitz. Dershowitz's effort to counter the accusations has been made all the more nettlesome because his long- ago representation of Epstein has come unde

sed to defend Theranos, will once again confront Alan Dershowitz, the intellectual bulwark on O.J. Sim

itude toward people of color, his approach to immigrants detained at the border, his answers to violence in American cities, and on and on. But in Appleton, Wis., the Rev. Dennis Episcopo hasn't felt the need as a religious leader to denounce any of it in front of his congregation, which includes more

cket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

t 410 ("Simply put, once a federal court determines that it is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court is powerless to continue."); Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1994) ("[A] court must first determine whether it has proper subject matter jurisdiction before addressing the subst

cket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

t 410 ("Simply put, once a federal court determines that it is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court is powerless to continue."); Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1994) ("[A] court must first determine whether it has proper subject matter jurisdiction before addressing the subst

ocket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See 13A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

t 410 ("Simply put, once a federal court determines that it is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court is powerless to continue."); Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1994) ("[A] court must first determine whether it has proper subject matter jurisdiction before addressing the subst

n the case." 27 EFTA00208849 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

t 410 ("Simply put, once a federal court determines that it is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court is powerless to continue."); Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1366 (I I th Cir. 1994) ("[A] court must first determine whether it has proper subject matter jurisdiction before addressing the sub