Epstein Secrets

S DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ , Defendant. Before: x 19 CV 3377 (LAP) New York, N.Y. December 2, 2019 9:06 a.m. HON. LORETTA A. PRESKA District Judge APPEARANCES COOPER

d 12/20/19 Page 3 of 28 JC29GIUC 2 4 5 6 7 THE COURT: ready? MR. C. COOPER: THE COURT: And is defense MR. H. COOPER: THE COURT: against Dershowitz. Is plaintiff your Honor. your Honor. Good morning. All right, counsel. I was Yes, Good morning. ready? Yes, Good morning. 8 a little conce

ary if not preposterous to attack a statement by Professor Dershowitz that he's only had sex with his wife for the las

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ , Defendant. Before: x 19 CV 3377

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 will seek privileged materials in light of the crime fraud exception and U.S. v. Zolin at least in the First Circuit. And I think inevitably, your Honor, that will lead to a -- THE COURT: Motion practice. MR. H. COOPER: Yes. And perha

32, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08- 80994 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. AUerbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.

fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. Sse Lg., DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 (1989Xdisclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing parties t

32, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08- 80994 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, M

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing par