Epstein Secrets

a state sentencing is. amongst many other issues. properly within the aegis of state decision making. Your December 19 letter references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Statute § 796.03. Professor Dershowitz made such arguments in the context of saying that he had been u

that "we have reiterated in previous submissions that Mr. Epstein does not believe he is 'See July 6, 2007 letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt, Esq. and Alan Dershowitz. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013363 EFTA00230268 12/28/07 FRI 14:27 FAX 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE 1002 guilty of the federal charges enu

ision making. Your December 19 letter references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Sta

6, 2007 letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt, Esq. and Alan Dershowitz. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013363

nts, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming person! injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the tbnn of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to the

ecessary to do so if he wishes. Third, I would like to address the issue raised regarding Florida Statute Section 796.03. At our meeting, Professor Dershowitz took the position that Mr. Epstein believes that his conduct does not satisfy the elements f this offense. His assertion raises for me substantial c

Florida Statute Section 796.03. At our meeting, Professor Dershowitz took the position that Mr. Epstein believes that

, their credibility and the foundations. il' any. for claiming personal istiory. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in the Ponta of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to th

at a state sentencing is. amongst many other issues. properly within the aegis astute decision making. Your December 19 letter references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Statute f 796.03. Professor Dershowitz made such arguments in the context of saying that he had been u

ision making. Your December 19 letter references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Sta

ts, their credibility and the foundations. if any. for claiming personal injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in the lbrm of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to the

at a state sentencing is. amongst many other issues, properly within the aegis of state decision making. Your December 19 Mier references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Statute § 796.03. Professor Dershowitz made such ary.uments in the context at' saying that he had been

ecision making. Your December 19 Mier references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Sta

s. their, credibility and the foundations. if any. fir claiming personal injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in tlx: form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to th

gotiate theNon-Frosecution Agreement These negotiations were detailed and time-consuming. Mr. Epstein's defense team, including yourself, Professor Dershowitz, former United States Attorney Guy Lewis, Ms. Lilly Ann Sanchez and Messrs. Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, Gerry Lefeourt and Jay Lefkowitz had the opp

Florida Statute Section 796.03. At our meeting, Professor Dershowitz took the position that Mr. Epstein believes that

ts, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to the

gotiate theNon-Frosecution Agreement These negotiations were detailed and time-consuming. Mr. Epstein's defense team, including yourself, Professor Dershowitz, former United States Attorney Guy Lewis, Ms. Lilly Ann Sanchez and Messrs. Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, Gerry Lefcourt and Jay Lefkowitz had the opp

Florida Statute Section 796.03. At our meeting, Professor Dershowitz took the position that Mr. Epstein believes that

ts, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to the

looseleaf service updated annually). 3A Charles Alan Wright, Federa 1 Practice and Procedure SS 761-7

on probable cause, the court commonly will schedule a consolidated preliminary and detention hearing at which the prosecution must make available "Jencks" statements. If a hup://10.173.2.12/usao/cousa/olc/usaboolddrug/26drug.lum 4/10/2008 EFTA00191628 Federal Narcotics Prosecutions - Chapter 26 P