Epstein Secrets

yde and Conyers replied: REP. HYDE: I thank you, Professor Dershowitz. I don't thank you for criticizing the motives, s

apacities, recently told me that before anything involving these issues left his office, Senator Kennedy would tell his staff members, “check it with Alan.” It was high honor and privilege to assist so great a senator on so many occasions. The last time I was him was just months before his death when he

ny real sense that justice in some way had gone astray.” And one commentator snidely observed that Von Bulow’s “recruitment of Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz shortly after his conviction would tend to reinforce” the view that Claus Von Bulow “was no longer protecting his innocence, merely the methods used

his conviction would tend to reinforce” the view that Claus Von Bulow “was no longer protecting his innocence, merely the methods used to catch him...Dershowitz enjoys a wide reputation as a last resort for convicted criminals, being especially keep at finding legal loopholes that render his clients’ convicti

s a good deal of homogeneity over the generations of Harvard College classes, as well as homogeneity in a large part of any given class. Mr. Justice Blackmun doubted whether there was much difference between the Davis and Harvard programs, commenting that the “cynical” may say that “under a program such as

Let me see the statements again, please. 16 MR. INDYKE: Objection. To the extent the 17 knowledge of the facts of this case derive from 18 Mr. Dershowitz's representation of Mr. Epstein, 19 I don't think he can answer that question 20 without violating the privilege. 21 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: H

nto 20 attorney-client. 21 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead ad make 22 your point. 23 MR. INDYKE: My point is that it sounds to 24 me that Alan is now discussing attorney-client 25 matters and internal decisions and strategies www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615700 580 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

HOWITZ www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615767 647 ERRATA SHEET DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER CHANGES HERE In Re: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ET AL., V. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ Case No.: ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ January 12, 2016 PAGE LINE CHANGE REASON Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing d

talk about my client being presumed 14 innocent, my client being innocent. That's part of 15 the role of a criminal defense lawyer. Justice 16 Blackmun has said that the criminal defense lawyer's 17 role does not end in a courtroom, it continues to 18 the courthouse steps. 19 And so when my cli

to 12:10:00 9 you. 10 A. I didn't -- 12:10:02 11 Q. It would have been very significant had 12:10:03 12 ever said, I never met Alan 13 Dershowitz, right? 14 MR. SCOTT: Objection, argumentative. Go 12:10:10 15 ahead. 16 A. It wouldn't have been significant to me 12:10:11 17 because I

's my belief, yes. 12 Q. Are you aware that your lawyers filed a 12:32:14 13 pleading on your behalf in this case with the title 14 Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz's Answer to the 15 Complaint and Counterclaim? 16 A. I'm not aware of that. 12:32:23 17 Q. Pardon me? 12:32:24 18 A. I'm not aware of the

him first in Palm Beach 15:53:11 8 County, and at that point, he had been prepared to 9 plead guilty to, I think, one count -- 10 MR. WEINBERG: Alan, I'm sorry. This is 15:53:24 11 again, going right into the work that you did 12 for him as his lawyer and I instruct you not to 13 answer. 1

ading hoping to get judicial immunity, yes, at 4 that point the appropriate response is in the court 5 of public opinion. 6 That's what Justice Blackmun said in a 15:46:00 7 concurring opinion in the Supreme Court, that the 8 duty of a lawyer does not stop at the courtroom door 9 but it continu

rcia(a:bellsouth.net Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

statutory enactments is simply not present here, and the record is devoid of any factual material that would support such a conclusion.10 As Justice Blackmun said in dissent in Landsgraf, there is no vested right to break the law." Bottom line is, a motion to dismiss a claim is not the correct procedural