Epstein Secrets

James Cayne, Ralph R. Cioffi, Jeffrey M. Farber, Alan Greenberg, Raymond McGarrigal, Samuel Molinaro, A

the Respondent Releasees, including Representative Claims and any Claims that any Claimant asserted or could have asserted in the Arbitration, the Action; or the Consolidated Action, that in any way arise out of, are connected with or relate to: (a) any of the HG Funds or the ABS Funds (together, the

James Cayne, Ralph R. Cioffi, Jeffrey M. Farber, Alan Greenberg, Raymond McGarrigal, Samuel Molinaro, A

ds 2 Settlement Payment. - 5- I KU ,11,11c2 %in= EFTA00615379 2.1 In consideration of the dismissal with prejudice of the Arbitration and the Action and the releases in favor of the Respondent Releasees by Claimants set forth in paragraph 3.1, and in full and final satisfaction of all Claimant Re

James Cayne, Ralph R. Cioffi, Jeffrey M. Farber, Alan Greenberg, Raymond McGarrigal, Samuel Molinaro, A

ownership interest in any of the Funds. 2. Settlement Payment. 2.1 In consideration of the dismissal with prejudice of the Arbitration and the Action and the releases in favor of the Respondent Releasees by Claimants set forth in - 5 - EFTA00283095 paragraph 3.1, and in full and final satisfact

nsel: WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Alan Schoenfeld Boyd M. Johnson III 7 World Trade Ce

forth my background as a mediator to provide context for the comments that follow, and to demonstrate that my perspective on the settlement of this Action is rooted in significant experience in the resolution of complex litigation. As described below, this Action presented complicated legal, factual,

James Cayne, Ralph R. Cioffi, Jeffrey M. Farber, Alan Greenberg, Raymond McGarrigal, Samuel Molinaro, A

s, affiliates, parents and subsidiaries. 2. Settlement Payment. 2.1 In consideration of the dismissal with prejudice of the Arbitration and the Action and the releases in favor of the Respondent Releasees by Claimants set forth in paragraph 3.1, and in full satisfaction of all Claims asserted and/o

n Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

s disagreement between the parties is properly the subject of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Cause of Action, and Motion For More Definite Statement; Motion to Strike, and Supporting Memorandum of Law (D.E. 47) which is currently pending before this Court.

jphesearcylaw.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

s disagreement between the parties is properly the subject of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Cause of Action, and Motion For More Definite Statement; Motion to Strike, and Supporting Memorandum of Law (D.E. 47) which is currently pending before this Court.

en & Sir- cusa ("RMJS"), and others, principally Alan Garfinkel and Leigh Katzman, form- ing Katzman Ga

ose would be to sanction Rosenbaum for his alleged un- authorized disclosures of his clients' privi- leged information in his Request for Judi- cial Action and at the April 16 hearing, enjoin Rosenbaum from future similar con- duct, determine whether Rosenbaum vio- lated Florida Bar Rules of Professiona

IRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ’S REDACTED MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Defenda

! JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, V. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY JANE DOE NO. 3 Non-party Jane Doe 3, by and through unde

oena for documents sought for a federal action.” c. Category 3 — Documents that Contain Personal Financial Information Completely Irrelevant to this Action Defendant also wrongfully abuses the subpoena power to seek personal financial information from this non-party. See Woodward v. Berkery, 714 So. 2d

he attends star studded charity gala On behalf of Action on Addiction Charlie Sheen cuts a casual figure whil

1 Motion and related filings should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for Limited Intervention filed by Alan M. Dershowitz, who seeks to intervene to “strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and [to] request[] a show cause order to the attorneys

he Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz’s intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.? Regarding whether a show cause order shoul