Epstein Secrets

NTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs' lawyers filed Plaintiffs' Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the

To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and settlement negotiation letter that Epstein's defense lawyers s

eading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the P

' Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleadi

ut tempering or censoring their plea/settlement communications to avoid making statements that could later come back to haunt their clients in TMZ, the National Enquirer or the grocery store tabloids. c. The Harm Extends To Mr. Epstein, His Counsel, And Beyond We know of no case that has authorized the wholesale pu

NTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs' lawyers filed Plaintiffs' Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the

To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and settlement negotiation letter that Epstein's defense lawyers s

eading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the P

' Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleadi

ut tempering or censoring their plea/settlement communications to avoid making statements that could later come back to haunt their clients in TMZ, the National Enquirer or the grocery store tabloids. c. The Harm Extends To Mr. Epstein, His Counsel, And Beyond We know of no case that has authorized the wholesale pu

ge defense letter and exhibits that the plaintiffs have filed under seal as Exhibit 30 to Plaintiffs= Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz should remain sealed. e. The Proposed Confidentiality Order Correctly Resolves The Court=s Balancing Task The protective order proposed by the pa

se To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and setttlement negotiation letter that Epstein=s defense lawyers

leading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the P

= Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleadi

ut tempering or censoring their plea/settlement communications to avoid making statements that could later come back to haunt their clients in TMZ, the National Enquirer or the grocery store tabloids. c. The Harm Extends To Mr. Epstein, His Counsel, And Beyond We know of no case that has authorized the wholesale

ingly, many of those articles — which have notably increased in tempo in recent weeks following Roberts’ late December accusation that noted attorney Alan Dershowitz was one of the men she was forced to have sex with — contain language underscoring the fact that none of this proves anything. “It should at this sta

she ever actually treated Epstein to one,” Gawker (in the most straightforward and clearest reporting on the documents to date) wrote last week. And the National Enquirer did not appear to rely on the court record for its conclusions, instead to the interpretation of an unnamed source who noted that “Bill’s name is al

s tampering. He avoided most of those charges as well as federal prosecution in late 2007 by agreeing to plead guilty in Florida court, a deal that Dershowitz, who was one of Epstein’s lawyers, helped negotiate along with an all-star legal lineup that interestingly also included famed Clinton-hunter Ken St

ingly, many of those articles — which have notably increased in tempo in recent weeks following Roberts’ late December accusation that noted attorney Alan Dershowitz was one of the men she was forced to have sex with — contain language underscoring the fact that none of this proves anything. “It should at this sta

she ever actually treated Epstein to one,” Gawker (in the most straightforward and clearest reporting on the documents to date) wrote last week. And the National Enquirer did not appear to rely on the court record for its conclusions, instead to the interpretation of an unnamed source who noted that “Bill’s name is all

s tampering. He avoided most of those charges as well as federal prosecution in late 2007 by agreeing to plead guilty in Florida court, a deal that Dershowitz, who was one of Epstein’s lawyers, helped negotiate along with an all-star legal lineup that interestingly also included famed Clinton-hunter Ken St

—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one we

next notorious masturbation enhancer. In the eyes of the media—from NBC News to MWghtline, from TIME magazine to People, from the New York Times to the National Enquirer, from the Washington Post to Entertainment Tonight—| am purely a commodity. Naturally, | believe in the First Amendment, so I’ m against censorship.

x Case," The New York Times, Sep. 3, 2006. (Exhibit A) FOIA Request and Constructive Denial 9. On April 20, 2017 James Robertson, a Senior Editor for The National Enquirer and sister- publication Radar Online, submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for all documents relating to the investigation and prosecution of Epstein

crat, have returned campaign contributions from him. But Mr. Epstein fought back, assembling a team of star lawyers, including Gerald B. Lefcourt and Alan M. Dershowitz, a friend of his, to look into the backgrounds of his young accusers. Mr. Lefcourt says that the police acted "outrageously" and that his client has

Krischer would convene a grand jury to examine the evidence and decide what charges, if any, to bring. Around that time, the police report said, Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share information about the accusers, including statements they had posted on MySpace.com, the social networking site, concer

x Case," The New York Times, Sep. 3, 2006. (Exhibit A) FOIA Request and Constructive Denial 9. On April 20, 2017 James Robertson, a Senior Editor for The National Enquirer and sister- publication Radar Online, submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for all documents relating to the investigation and prosecution of Epstein

crat, have returned campaign contributions from him. But Mr. Epstein fought back, assembling a team of star lawyers, including Gerald B. Lefcourt and Alan M. Dershowitz, a friend of his, to look into the backgrounds of his young accusers. Mr. Lefcourt says that the police acted "outrageously" and that his client has

Krischer would convene a grand jury to examine the evidence and decide what charges, if any, to bring. Around that time, the police report said, Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share information about the accusers, including statements they had posted on MySpace.com, the social networking site, concer