Epstein Secrets

?NAPC=S&AccessionNo=GRDN000020110304e735000j4 • The Guardian, MEDIA Article.United Kingdom.Headline:Comment: Not quite a cannibal: Debating whether Prince Andrew's friend was a paedophile or not misses the point of exploitation, http://global.factiva.comrenidu/article.asp?NAPC=S&AccessionNo=GRDN000020110307e738

1001me • The Mail on Sunday. MEDIA Article,United Kingdom,Headline:GHISLAINE SERVED TEA FROM A PORCELAIN POT. SHE KNEW FERGIE AND THEY TALKED ABOUT ANDREWS DAUGHTERS. SHE ASKED ANDREW HOW OLD I WAS. HE GUESSED 17 AND THEY ALL LAUGHED, http://global.factiva.corn/enkhilarlide.asONAPC=S&AccessionNo=MOSM00

the paedophile are suddenly the talk of New York: The Duke of York's friendship with billionaire sex offender Jeffr

APC=S8AccessionNo=OB00000020110312e73d0004c • The Daily Telegraph. MEDIA Anicle.United Kingdom.Headline:HE DOES THE JOB WE ASK OF HIM: Whatever the Dukes private indiscretions, when it comes to promoting Britain's trade interests his vigour cant be faulted. says Praveen Swami, http://global.factiva.c

admissible (Motion in Limine 3).................+ 8 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)... i.e seeeesseeseere

ney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d 706 (1st Dept. 1965)35 Sidor v. Reno, 95 CIV. 9588 (KMW), 1998 WL 164823, *2 (S.D.N.Y. April 7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) oo. ceiceeccssseeseceseesseeeseesseeeeecseessaeeseeesneeees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir,

sible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's cl

ney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d 706 (1st Dept. 1965)35 Sidor v. Reno, 95 CIV. 9588 (KMW), 1998 WL 164823, *2 (S.D.N.Y. April 7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) o.oo ccecccecccccccceccceesccessscssseecneeeesstecsseeenees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir.