Epstein Secrets

w Albert Christian Edward (a/Icla Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

. . . (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Icla Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

ined what Ghislaine Maxwell is doing there and who took that picture — while Jane Doe No. 3 has provided a sworn affidavit that the photographer was Prince Andrew's close friend (as well as sex trafficker and now-registered sex offender): Jeffrey Epstein. Jane Doe No. 29 As noted earlier, two other key conspira

lly seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others. Further efforts from the Government

e declined to allow a mere "reputational" interest to justify mandatory intervention. For example, Calloway" Westinghouse Eke. Cop., 115 F.R.D. 73 (M.D. Ga. 1987), denied a motion to intervene where the alleged interest was a doctor's "own reputation and academic credibility." Id. at 74. The court denied inte

LSD Doc. ., 01/21/2015 Page 20 of 40 between May 2007 and September 2008 on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein by . .. (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." While the Government denied that it had documents reflecting contacts by Prince Andrew,

ement, including efforts on his behalf by Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

rew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

by . .. (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

declined to allow a mere "reputational" interest to justify mandatory intervention. For example, Calloway'. Westinghouse Elea Corp., 115 F.R.D. 73 (M.D. Ga. 1987). denied a motion to intervene where the alleged interest was a doctor's "own reputation and academic credibility." Id. at 74. The court denied inte

rties in describing what is claimed to be the law to Court. For example, the Response quotes Calloway v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 115 F.R.D. 73, 74 (M.D. Ga. 1987) for the proposition that “a witness’ interest in his reputation alone . . . does not constitute the required ‘interest relating to the property or t

ut keep those alleged figures anonymous? The bad faith against Prof. Dershowitz is apparent’. ' Similarly, Jane Doe #3’s allegations that she named Prince Andrew because of outstanding 5 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010739 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 6 of

w involved in “lobbying efforts to persuade the Government to give him a more favorable plea arrangement,” and because her allegations against Prince Andrews occurred in London, therefore “affect[ing] foreign commerce” are patently absurd. (DE 291 at 20 and 18, fn. 10.) Because Jane Doe #3’s other allegati