Epstein Secrets

LSD Doc. ., 01/21/2015 Page 20 of 40 between May 2007 and September 2008 on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein by . .. (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." While the Government denied that it had documents reflecting contacts by Prince Andrew,

ement, including efforts on his behalf by Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

rew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

by . .. (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

d be asked about Derhowitz's involvement took the Fifth." This "[sJilence is . . . evidence of the most persuasive character." United States ex rd. Bilokumsky 'Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). quoted in Baxter 1 Palmigiano, 425 U.S 308, 319 (1976). And that silence takes on an even more si

nt incarceration (discussed below), he frequently traveled around the globe in the company of such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable to infer that he has international contacts, including international financial contacts. See Affidav

f such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable t

ed long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action

orts, Jeffrey Epstein has travelled internationally with Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew. See, e.g., The Daily Mail, Prince Andrew's Billionaire Friend is Accused of Preying on Girl of 14, Apr. 29, 2007, http://www.dailyznail.co.uldnews/article- 451372/Prince-Andrews-billionaire-f

famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable to

zed long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.'" Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action