Epstein Secrets

ty fines over money-laundering and mortgage-securities scandals. Also hanging over Deutsche Bank was its longtime role as lender to former President Donald Trump, which put the bank in the middle of political fights and congressional investigations. Last year, the New York Department of Financial Services fi

ongtime role as lender to former President Donald Trump, which put the bank in the middle of political f

s its longtime role as lender to former President Donald Trump, which put the bank in the middle of polit

cant lack of uniformity in the DOJ's current approach to privilege reviews. But a recent Eleventh Circuit decision may lead to greater consistency. The Eleventh Circuit's Recent Decision In U.S. v. ICorf,[4] the Eleventh Circuit upheld the DOJ's use of a taint team to conduct a privilege review of materials seized fro

ted at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- Donald Kent I i None] D met u/c officer (posing 2043

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 20437 Donald Kent 1 (None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Mini! court wrote that, under the "plain language

meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 20437 Donald Kent 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"