Epstein Secrets

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, 'in the abse

SD Docket 06/24/2019 Page 11 of 32 (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the CVRA beyond those expressly contained in the Act); see also Karahalios v. Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees, 489 U.S. 527, 533 (1989) ("[I]t is . . . an 'elemental canon of statutory construction that where a statute expre

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald,. Southern Farm Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, `in the absenc

of contrary congressional intent, . . . compelled to conclude that Congress provided precisely the remedies it considered appropriate."') (quoting Karahalios, 489 U.S. at 533). Moreover, the additional civil remedies that Petitioners seek to engraft onto the CVRA are simply not recognized remedies within

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald,. Southern Farm Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, `in the absenc

of contrary congressional intent, . . . compelled to conclude that Congress provided precisely the remedies it considered appropriate."') (quoting Karahalios, 489 U.S. at 533). Moreover, the additional civil remedies that Petitioners seek to engraft onto the CVRA are not recognized remedies within the cr