Epstein Secrets

t include: (1) Epstein may own a Boeing 727 with a trading room (See Affidavit of Paul Cassell '1[7); (2) Epstein has travelled internationally with Donald Trump and is Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2009 Page 8 of 24 Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra/Jo

); (2) Epstein has travelled internationally with Donald Trump and is Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document

Epstein has travelled internationally with Donald Trump and is Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 198

strict Court of Appeals characterized as "a series of temporary injunctions without the necessary showing of entitlement to injunctive relief." Id. The Second District quashed the order granting the injunction and held that "[a]n injunction cannot be used to enforce money damages or prevent a party of disposing of

's Order entered March 8, 2018, by the Honorable Donald Hafele, denying Epstein's Motion to Remove Case

ari, this Court recognizes that compliance with the mandatory nature of Rule 1.440 is so fundamental that it warrants mandamus relief. Id. at 421. The Second District also has recognized that strict compliance with Rule 1.440 is required, and has granted mandamus relief absent such compliance. See Gawker Media, L

h 13, 2018,' and the circuit court (the Honorable Donald Hafele) has just made two rulings which warrant

cognizes that compliance with the mandatory nature of Rule 1.440 is so fundamental that it warrants mandamus relief. Id. at 421. 9 EFTA00793775 The Second District also has recognized that strict compliance with Rule 1.440 is required, and has granted mandamus relief absent such compliance. See Gawker Media, L

fact that I notified him that I intended to take Donald Trump’s deposition in the civil suits against him. Trump

secution action brought by a physician against his patients and an expert after he successfully defended a malpractice claim. Also of significance is the Second District’s opinion in Olson v. Johnson, 961 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). In that case, the court observed that the litigation (or judicial) privilege would no

he deposition of Donald Trump. Edwards possessed a legitimate basis for doing so: (a) The message pads eaifisnated from Epstein’s home indicated that Trump called Epstein’s West Palm Beach mansion on several occasions during the time period most relevant to my Edwards’s clients’ complaints; (b) Trump was