Epstein Secrets

stions as well: Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROL

uct privilege. Id. at 126-127. Edwards wrongfully claimed the work product privilege for these questions as well: Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROLA: Objection, work product. Instruct you not to answer. Id. at 155.6 Q. Who did [Mike Fisten] go to Califo

by this time already put considerable allegations concerning the answer to this question into the records. Obviously, his clients' interaction with Maxwell was not intended to be kept in confidence. 7 EFTA00606632 Q. Who other than Mr. Fisten from an investigator, from an internal investigator at

d privilege for "fact" work product - factual information concerning the client's case and prepared or gathered in connection with its preparation. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Weeks, 696 So. 2d 855, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (trial judge did not depart from essential requirements of by not protecting materials from discov

FFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defe

NIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee

eeneees 22 Chnapkova v. Koh, 985 F.2d 79, 82 (2d Cir. 1993) oes cecccsscessecseeceseesseeseeeseceseesseesseeeseeeeeeseeeseeees 22 Daniels by Glass v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So.2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993) .....cescesesseeseeeteeeseeeees 4 DeVaul v Carvige ing. 526 N.Y 8.20 483 (2d Dept 1988 cos savesowussnsseneesessens sm

74) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice) Ty Gee (pro hac vice) HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell 37 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011470 --- PAGE BREAK --- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on March 17, 2017, I electronically served this Defendant’s R

7/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn eee ee eee xX VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty G

FFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response

NIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s R

... eee 22 Chnapkova v. Koh, 985 F.2d 79, 82 (2d Cir. 1993) ....cccccccccccccccesecsessesseesscesseessecssesseesssesseeeaeenes 22 Daniels by Glass v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So.2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993) ......cccccccecseteeteeteees 4 DeVaul v Carvigo Inc., 526 N.Y.S.2d 483 (2d Dept. 1988)... ccc cece cece cs eeteeeteeee