eeneees 22 Chnapkova v. Koh, 985 F.2d 79, 82 (2d Cir. 1993) oes cecccsscessecseeceseesseeseeeseceseesseesseeeseeeeeeseeeseeees 22 Daniels by Glass v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So.2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993) .....cescesesseeseeeteeeseeeees 4 DeVaul v Carvige ing. 526 N.Y 8.20 483 (2d Dept 1988 cos savesowussnsseneesessens sm

... eee 22 Chnapkova v. Koh, 985 F.2d 79, 82 (2d Cir. 1993) ....cccccccccccccccesecsessesseesscesseessecssesseesssesseeeaeenes 22 Daniels by Glass v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So.2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993) ......cccccccecseteeteeteees 4 DeVaul v Carvigo Inc., 526 N.Y.S.2d 483 (2d Dept. 1988)... ccc cece cece cs eeteeeteeee

d privilege for "fact" work product - factual information concerning the client's case and prepared or gathered in connection with its preparation. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Weeks, 696 So. 2d 855, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (trial judge did not depart from essential requirements of by not protecting materials from discov

kaleidoscope of supervisors (male and female), subject to a variety of regional policies [* 91 0] that all differed." Id. at 2557 (quoting Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571, 652 (9th Cir. 2010) (Kozinski, J., dissenting)). The scale and scope of the putative class, combined with the nature of the evidence