Epstein Secrets

Protective Order for the three mini- VHS tapes that I referenced below. EFTA00026894 I learned this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we can plan for the review to take place at 500 Pearl Street from 9:30am to 4:30pm each day beginning

ed this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

tions under the Protective Order for the three mini- VHS tapes that I referenced below. I learned this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we can plan for the review to take place at 500 Pearl Street from 9:30am to 4:30pm each day beginning

ed this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

tions under the Protective Order for the three mini- VHS tapes that I referenced below. I learned this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we can plan for the review to take place at 500 Pearl Street from 9:30am to 4:30pm each day beginning

ed this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

let you know. From: Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 4:29 PM To: (NY) (FBI) < > Cc: (USANYS) < INYPD)< > Subject: (EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FW: US v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Hi As you can see below, the defense wants to the do the Bronx

ed this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

ERNHEIM' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, hi

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

RNHEIM' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, hi

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

Everdell; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIMI Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (MN) - Request to view evidence, hig

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

Everdell; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIMI Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (MN) - Request to view evidence, hig

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

•IMIMMIE> )" < " (USANYS)" Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, hi

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

RNHEIM' <bcstemheimgmac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, hi

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio