From: Laura Menninger [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesda Aril 07 2021 4:23 PM To: y; ); (USANYS) Cc: Jeff Pagliuca; Christian Everdell; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIMI Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (MN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes My apologies, I meant to include in my previous email that we could have the Bronx view on Monday April 12. Thank you for the logistics. Regarding the spreadsheets you provided, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 16127-130 (4 boxes). • Item 1B13 (1 box) Florida Evidence List . Item 1, Subitem 26 — one large framed photo from Master Bedroom. Second, with regard to the "Bulky" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to address with the Court promptly any issues related to our request to view all evidence. Fourth, Electronic surveillance — Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicious that "one original recording of an interview" is not truly only an "electronic" file? I was practicing law in 2007 and do not recall "electronic files" being the standard then. Can you please confirm? I know that Chris has written separately about the many files for which the metadata has apparently been stripped, so we will have to address purely electronic information at another date. Shredded Paper — Yes, we need to review that as well. "Missing from Assigned Box" items — can you please provide more of an explanation for all "missing items"? I will let you know any other issues as I see them. However, now that we have made travel plans in reliance on your agreement to produce all evidence items, I am hoping that you can promptly answer these questions so that we can resolve any of them as needed this week. Thank you, -Laura Laura A. Menninger I Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue I Denver, CO 80203 +I 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger(unflaw.com EFTA00030036