7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
28 / 7
Mentions
to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United
se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..
these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND
ld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See Def. Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United
se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..
these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND
ld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See Def. Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United
se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..
these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND
ld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See Def. Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United
se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..
these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND
ld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See Def. Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United
se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..
these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND
ld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See Def. Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United
se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..
these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND
ld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See Def. Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
ant presented to the Court at the initial bail hearing was undisputedly incomplete, and as the Court noted, the Court lacked "a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances and the resources available to her." Tr. at 86 87. The Defendant has now presented to the Court what is perhaps a more thorough report o
pursuant to a request from Olivier Laude, a partner at the French firm Laude Esquier Champey acting on behalf of Cohen & Gresser LLP as counsel for Ms Ghislaine Maxwell. The request was made in the context of ongoing bail proceedings involving Ms Maxwell in the United States of America (hereafter "USA"), where Ms M
207a0063390eNt Thaatiallat 1 [email protected] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S THIRD MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BAIL Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Of
Court noted, the Court lacked "a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances and the resources available to her."
eld in trust for the benefit of the Defendant for the period stemming from 2015 to 2020. See De£ Mot., Ex. O. In addition, the Defendant retained a Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent, who reviewed the Macalvins report and the underlying documents and determined that report accurately represents the
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and Certified Fraud Examiner

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
United Kingdom
LOCATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
New Hampshire
LOCATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATIONO'Brien
PERSONMorrison
PERSON
Bernie Madoff
PERSONBoustani
PERSONKarni
PERSON
Contreras
PERSONRaniere
PERSON
Mattis
PERSONPetrov
PERSONStroh
PERSON