Epstein Secrets

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

and Islands [2020] 1 WLR 1644, pares. 41-49 and Henderson v Government of Australia [2015] EWHC 1421 (Admin), pares. 19.26. " Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus [1978] I WLR 779 at 784. " Oppression requires personal or family hardship greater than that inevitably inherent in the act of extradition when fac

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

and Islands [2020] 1 WLR 1644, pares. 41-49 and Henderson v Government of Australia [2015] EWHC 1421 (Admin), pares. 19.26. " Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus [1978] I WLR 779 at 784. " Oppression requires personal or family hardship greater than that inevitably inherent in the act of extradition when fac

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

and Islands [2020] 1 WLR 1644, pares. 41-49 and Henderson v Government of Australia [2015] EWHC 1421 (Admin), pares. 19.26. " Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus [1978] I WLR 779 at 784. " Oppression requires personal or family hardship greater than that inevitably inherent in the act of extradition when fac

is life, mostly young, but there is no one of them to whom he has been able to commit. He describes his most public companion of the last decade, Ghislaine Maxwell. 41. the daughter of the late, disgraced media baron Robert Max- well, as simply his -best friend." He says she is not on his payroll, but she seem

Side dinners." the woman recalls. "Many seemed foreign and dressed a little bizarrely." This same guest also at- tended a cocktail party thrown by Maxwell that Prince Andrew attended, which was filled, she says. with young Russian mod- els. "Some of the guests were horrified," the woman says. "He's

n Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the fat and fraudulent former owner of the Daily News, the late Robert Maxwell. I hear that some of the 39-year-old Ghislaine's friends on the Manhattan and London party circuit are cutting her because she's had so much adverse press over her relationship with Prince Andre

r of Parliament and leader of United Democrats, head of the Negotiating Team for the Accession of Cyprus to the European Union, former President of the Republic of Cyprus, Nicosia Franco Venturini, Foreign Correspondent, Corriere della Sera, Rome Friedrich Verzetnitsch, Member of Austrian Parliament; President, Aust

OF DOCUMENT PRESENTED I HEREBY CERTIFY BY V PROVISIO RTICLEI THE ORIGINAL TO ME WHICH IRTUE OF THE 3 419O013 ...20... DB-SDNY-0066210 SDNY GM 00212394 EFTA01372497

or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the Republic of Cyprus. Each of the Trustee and the Beneficiary agree that the courts of Cyprus shall have non-exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute or claim arisin