Epstein Secrets

aMbesf1laf 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -against- ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. No. 19 Civ. 3377 (LAP) No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) MEMORANDUM & ORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Be

tive Order.° All of those materials and any material, including work product, derived from the Maxwell materials (other than the deposition ofl in Maxwells) shall be destroyed. Counsel shall submit an affidavit detailing the steps taken to do so. Furthermore, to the extent that it is doing so, Cooper &

materials produced in discovery that "are confidential" and that implicate "common law and statutory privacy interests" of and Maxwell Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell"). (Id. 1 3.) Under the order, materials properly marked CONFIDENTIAL "shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the prep

s" of and Maxwell Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell"). (Id. 1 3.) Under the order, materials properl

ourt rules that certain discovery materials from the Maxwell case are not properly in possession of Plaintiff

f inquiry the court undertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order. In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litig., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (D. Conn. 2009). At a broad level, Mr. Dershowitz has simply not demonstrated the existence of an "extraordinary circumstanc

.D.N.Y. 2012) 11, 12 In re EPDM Antitrust Litt., 255 F.R.D. 308 (D. Conn. 2009) 12 Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2004) v. Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433, 2017 WL 1787934 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 2017) 10, 11 10 Intl Equity Investments, Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd, No. 2010 W

THERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) MEMORANDUM OF L

THERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) MEMORAN

er. First, the Protective Order is broadly drafted and the Court has great latitude to amend a protective order with such a broad scope. In re EPDM Antitrust Litig., 255 F.R.D. 308, 319 (D. Conn. 2009) (a blanket protective order is "more likely to be subject to modification than a more specific, targeted order

bpoena. The application is granted. I. Background A. The Protective Order In September 2015, Virginia L. Giuffre commenced a civil suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging that Maxwell had defamed Giuffre by stating that Giuffre was not the victim of sex crimes perpetrated by, among others, Maxwell a

e application is granted. I. Background A. The Protective Order In September 2015, Virginia L. Giuffre commenced a civil suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging that Maxwell had defamed Giuffre by stating that Giuffre was not the victim of sex crimes perpetrated by, among others, Maxwell and Jeffre

hat reliance was reasonable, where a protective order is, as here, a blanket order entered by stipulation of the parties." In re NASDAQ Mkt.-Makers Antitrust Litig., 164 F.R.D. 346, 356 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). As for the last factor, the nature of the parties' reliance on the order does seem to weigh against modifica

has filed an application for modification of a March 18, 2016 pretrial protective order, entered by the late Hon. in a civil defamation action, v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) ("the Action"), in order to permit the law firm of Boles Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply with a grand

ith a grand jury subpoena. The application is granted. I. Background A. The Protective Order In September 2015, commenced a civil suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging that Maxwell had defamed by stating that was not the victim of sex crimes perpetrated by, among others, Maxwell and Jeffrey Eps

hat reliance was reasonable, where a protective order is, as here, a blanket order entered by stipulation of the parties." In re NASDAQ Mkt.-Makers Antitrust Litig., 164 F.R.D. 346, 356 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). As for the last factor, the nature of the parties' reliance on the order does seem to weigh against modifica