Epstein Secrets

ust 18, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan; I write to update the Court regarding MDC ongoing interference with attorney-client communication between

rence with attorney-client communication between Ghislaine Maxwell and her counsel. Since December 2019, video teleconferences ("VTCs") between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense counsel's WebEx platform. There were no problems with VTCs with the exception of when the MDC place

Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan;

mber 2019, video teleconferences ("VTCs") between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense

LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C.STERNHEIA\ • Main • Cell • Fax August 18, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJ

ust 24, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The government cannot resist the opportunity to gratuitously cast Ghislaine Maxwell in a negative light wh

n a negative light while it defends the Metropolitan Detention Center at all costs, regardless of the facts. [Dkt. 326]. The government accuses Ms. Maxwell of using a cart to barricade the door to the VTC room. The cart was never used to barricade. The government has chosen to make this an issue - when

Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan:

of the facts. [Dkt. 326]. The government accuses Ms. Maxwell of using a cart to barricade the door to the VTC

LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM Main Cell Fax August 24, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJ

ust 18, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan; I write to update the Court regarding MDC ongoing interference with attorney-client communication between

rence with attorney-client communication between Ghislaine Maxwell and her counsel. Since December 2019, video teleconferences ("VTCs") between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense counsel's WebEx platform. There were no problems with VTCs with the exception of when the MDC place

Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan;

mber 2019, video teleconferences ("VTCs") between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense

LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C.STERNHEIM Main Cell Fax August 18, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJ

ust 18, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan; I write to update the Court regarding MDC ongoing interference with attorney-client communication between

rence with attorney-client communication between Ghislaine Maxwell and her counsel. Since December 2019, video teleconferences ("VTCs") between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense counsel's WebEx platform. There were no problems with VTCs with the exception of when the MDC place

Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan;

mber 2019, video teleconferences ("VTCs") between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense

LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C.STERNHEIA\ • Main Cell Fax August 18, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJ

ust 24, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The government cannot resist the opportunity to gratuitously cast Ghislaine Maxwell in a negative light wh

n a negative light while it defends the Metropolitan Detention Center at all costs, regardless of the facts. [Dkt. 326]. The government accuses Ms. Maxwell of using a cart to barricade the door to the VTC room. The cart was never used to barricade. The government has chosen to make this an issue - when

Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan:

of the facts. [Dkt. 326]. The government accuses Ms. Maxwell of using a cart to barricade the door to the VTC

LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM • Main Cell Fax August 24, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJ

f New York Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 5/11/2021 at 4:57 PM EDT and filed on 5/11/2021 Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Filer: Document Number:277 Docket Text: ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court has considered the parties' pro

57 PM EDT and filed on 5/11/2021 Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Filer: Document Number:277 Docket Text: ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court has considered the parties' proposals regarding the commencement of trial. Dkt. Nos. 275, 276. For the reasons stated in the Government's

: Document Number:277 Docket Text: ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court has considered the parties' pr

to the meet and confer. Any separately filed letters will be struck. SO ORDERED. (Time excluded from 5/11/2021 until 11/29/2021) (Signed by Judge J. Nathan on 5/11/2021) (InI) 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: David Boles, II [email protected] NYC Managing [email protected]

wrote: From: Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 5:46:56 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.

5:46 PM EDT and filed on 7/6/2020 Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: I :20-cr-00330-AJN Filer: Document Number:7 Docket Text: ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. This matter has been assigned to me for all purposes. In its July 5, 2020 letter, the Government on behalf of the parties requested that the Court

er: Document Number:7 Docket Text: ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. This matter has been assigned to me for

nsistent with this scheduling information, as well as a revised briefing schedule for the Defendant's bail application.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Nathan on 7/6/2020)(jbo) 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been delivered by other means to: T