esulted in cancelled legal visits. While the letter accurately states that one video teleconference (VTC) was EFTA00040347 LAW OFFICES OF 1300131 C.STERNHEIM scheduled for August 17th, it fails to report that the VTC was unsuccessful because the audio connection failed; and, despite constant ongoing requ

tentionally) with Ms. Maxwell's privileged communication. That concern manifested itself on August 12ih when EFTA00040660 LAW OFFICES OF 13O13131 C.STERNHEIM third parties accessed the Zoom room used by Ms. Maxwell and counsel. This breach was reported to, and I believe witnessed by, MDC staff, including

itate to take appropriate action in the fact of violations of any relevant rules." (Dkt. 28) (July 23, 2020). 2 EFTA00087797 LAW OFFICES OF DOH' C.STERNHEIM representing any party or witness to the case. Their position on the applicability of Rule 23.1 apparently fluctuates depending on who is talking t

tentionally) with Ms. Maxwell's privileged communication. That concern manifested itself on August 12ih when EFTA00097874 LAW OFFICES OF 13O13131 C.STERNHEIM third parties accessed the Zoom room used by Ms. Maxwell and counsel. This breach was reported to, and I believe witnessed by, MDC staff, including

tentionally) with Ms. Maxwell's privileged communication. That concern manifested itself on August 12ih when EFTA00097871 LAW OFFICES OF 13O13131 C.STERNHEIM third parties accessed the Zoom room used by Ms. Maxwell and counsel. This breach was reported to, and I believe witnessed by, MDC staff, including