Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATI

ISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Av

enue Denver, Colorado 80203 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00104411 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARGUMENT 3 I. The Court Should Not Apply the Annabi Rule and Instead Find that the NPA Bars Ms. Maxwell'

e Annabi Rule and Instead Find that the NPA Bars Ms. Maxwell's Prosecution on Counts One, Three, Five, and Six

79) 13, 14 United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1972) 10 United States v. Dionisio, 503 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2007) 12 United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3d Cir. 2002) 6, 7, 10 United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 7 United States v. Korfant, 771 F.2d 660 (2d C

t because Annabi did not address the circumstances of this case; it is also consistent with fundamental fairness. As the Third Circuit cautioned in Gebbie, individual U.S. Attorney's Offices should not view themselves as "sovereigns of autonomous fiefdoms" with the ability to charge a defendant with t

ESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00065989 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 7 A. The Structure of the NPA 8 B. The Negotiation of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NO

OURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESS

ould Be Dismissed for Breach of the NPA. 14 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Standing to Enforce the NPA. 15 B. The NPA

82 (2d Cir. 2019) 13, 26, 29, 30 United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 16, 17 United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3d Cir. 2002) 24, 25 United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 14, 22, 27, 29 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NO

OURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00099352 TAB

AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00099352 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 7 U The Structure of the NPA 8 B. The Negotiation of the

hould Be Dismissed for Breach of the NPA. 14 a Ms. Maxwell Has Standing to Enforce the NPA. 15 B. The NPA

82 (2d Cir. 2019) 13, 26, 29, 30 United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 16, 17 United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3d Cir. 2002) 24, 25 United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 14, 22, 27, 29 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO

RN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Av

lorado 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00103758 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT SUMMARY OF NEW ALLEGATIONS IN THE S2 INDICTMENT 4 ARGUMENT 5 I. The NPA Bars Ms.

E S2 INDICTMENT 4 ARGUMENT 5 I. The NPA Bars Ms. Maxwell's Prosecution on Counts One, Three, Five, and Six

20 United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1972) 17 United States v. Garcia-Gonzalez, 714 F.3d 306 (5th Cir. 2013) 21 United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3rd Cir. 2002) 14, 15, 16, 17 United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 14, 16 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION TO DISMISS THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF

of Bobbi C. Stemheim Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00028880 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. The NPA Applies to Ms. Maxwell, and She Has Standing to Enforce It. 2 II. The Co-Conspirator Immunity Provision is Not Limited to the SDFL. 7 III. The Co-Conspirator Immunit

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. The NPA Applies to Ms. Maxwell, and She Has Standing to Enforce It. 2 II. Th

182 (2d Cir. 2019) 5, 6, 10, 17 United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 3, 4, 6 United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3d Cir. 2002) 12 United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 8 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 19