Epstein Secrets

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of New York ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs) V. ) ) ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-616 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s) ) SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION TO: (Defendant's name and address) A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 d

) ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-616 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s) ) SUMMONS IN A CIVIL AC

Action No. 17-cv-616 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s) ) SUMMONS IN A CIVIL AC

e $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. ; or , who is 0.00 ; or Server's signature Printed name and tide Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: Server's address I Print Save As... Reset EFTA0028

A. Yes, ma'am. Q. Did any of those appear to be Ms. Maxwell? A. Yes, ma'am. Q. You mentioned that who was

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 322 A. Yes, ma'am. Q. Did any of those appear to be Ms. Maxwell? A. Yes, ma'am. Q. You mentioned that who was still working there when you A. Yes, ma'am. Q. — was a very religious woman -- A. Yes, ma'am. Q.

y fees are S for travel and $ for services, for a total of S 0.00 Date: I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. ; or Server's signature Printed name and ink Server's adders Additional information regarding attempted service, etc EFTA00728188 alstiVe8-cv-8044tilantdil

DOE, will take the deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell on Monday, August 17, 2009, at 11:00 a.m., at: E

Plaintiff, JANE DOE, will take the deposition of Ghislane Noelle Maxwell on Monday, August 17, 2009, at 11:

y fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of S 0.00 Date: I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. ; or Server's signature Printed name and title Server's address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: EFTA00779729 UNITED STATES DISTRIC

e clarify the government's burden of proving all elements of the crime." United States v. Washburn, 444 F.3d, 1007, 1113 (8th Cir. 2006); see also, Server v. Mizell, 902 F.2d 611, 615, (7th Cir. 1990); United States v. Granbois, 119 F.App'x 35, 38-39 (9th Cir. 2004). Defendant's lone district court o

reveal the identities of the alleged victims. I'm not persuaded by defense counsel's arguments to the contrary. First, the defense notes that Ms. Maxwell does not pose a threat to any of the witnesses. That is plainly true, and the government does not argue or suggest or allege otherwise, but just b

s to the contrary. First, the defense notes that Ms. Maxwell does not pose a threat to any of the witnesses.