Epstein Secrets

ow precise. complete statement of relief sought: Order to Show Cause and March 13 Order should be reconsidered and vacated MOVING PARTY: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell OPhintiff DDefendant ['Appellant/Petitioner nAppeUee/Respondent MOVING ATTORNEY: Ty Gee [name of attorney, with fm. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman

Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page2 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant, v. SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, Intervenors-Appellants No. 18-

ment 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page4 of 27 has the ability to balance the public's interest in access to the discovery in court filings against Ms. Maxwell's and the non-parties' compelling interests. This is an extraordinary case. Ms. for more than a decade has actively pursued publicity and money fo

access to the discovery in court filings against Ms. Maxwell's and the non-parties' compelling interests. Thi

ved in an investigation"; "[t]he district court was in the best position to weigh these factors") (internal quotations and citation omitted); In re N.Y. Times Co., 828 F.2d 110,116 (2d Cir.1987) ("Certainly, the privacy interests of innocent third parties as well as those of defendants that may be harmed by d

v. Maxwell, — F.Supp.3d — (2018) 2018 WL 4062649 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, S.D. New York. Plaintiff,

F.Supp.3d — (2018) 2018 WL 4062649 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, S.D. New York. Plaintiff, v. Ghislaine MAXWELL, Defendant. 15 Civ. 7433 i Signed 08/27/2018 Synopsis Background: Following settlement of plaintiff's action for defamation, news media and inv

s District Court, S.D. New York. Plaintiff, v. Ghislaine MAXWELL, Defendant. 15 Civ. 7433 i Signed 08/2

her claim of defamation by Maxwell arising out of the Maxwell January 3 Statement. alleged she was the "victim

trating that `closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest,' " the documents may be sealed. In re N.Y. Times Co., 828 F.2d 110, 116 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Press-Enterprise Co., 464 U.S. at 510, 104 S.Ct. 819). The compelling interest is the privacy interest di

e the charges against him were pending. OA (citing United States v. Epstein 19 Cr. 490 (RMB), Nolle Prosequi (Dkt. No. 52))) B. The Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell On June 29, 2020, Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted by a grand jury in this District on "one count of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage

Prosequi (Dkt. No. 52))) B. The Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell On June 29, 2020, Ghislaine Maxwell was

ntent to engage in criminal sexual activity"; "and two counts of perjury." (Third Comey Decl. (Dkt. No. 59) 1 6) On December 29, 2021, a jury found Maxwell guilty of enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, transporting minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and

is that in FOIA actions, agency affidavits alone will support a grant of summary judgment,' and Local Civil Rule 56.1 statements are not required." N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309, 314 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Ferguson v. FBI 1995 WL 329307, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. 7 EFTA00038658 --- P