3
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
9 / 4
Mentions
, 2021 Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell renew our request that the Court release the names of potential jurors, for
Page: EFTA00018373 →Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan:
Page: EFTA00018373 →p questions, lead to additional cause challenges, or enable the parties to exercise their peremptory challenges in an informed manner. Recently, in Sines, et at v. Kessler, et at, 17-CV-72 (KNM) (W.D. Va.), the civil case brought against the organizers of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville,
Page: EFTA00018373 →lso the subject of extensive ongoing publicity. We submit that withholding the names of 600 jurors until the day of jury selection will deprive Ms. Maxwell of her right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury and is a procedure that would violate due process in this particular case.' "An impartial jur
Page: EFTA00018374 →ors until the day of jury selection will deprive Ms. Maxwell of her right to be tried by a fair and impartial
Page: EFTA00018374 →nd the leaders of hate groups that planned, promoted, and executed the violent acts in Charlottesville. (See Exhibit A, annexed.) The defendants in Sines included factions of the Ku Klux Klan. The concerns for juror privacy in Sines dwarf any conceivable concerns in this case and Sines is also the sub
Page: EFTA00018374 →, 2021 Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell renew our request that the Court release the names of potential jurors, for
lso the subject of extensive ongoing publicity. We submit that withholding the names of 600 jurors until the day of jury selection will deprive Ms. Maxwell of her right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury and is a procedure that would violate due process in this particular case.' "An impartial jur
Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan:
ors until the day of jury selection will deprive Ms. Maxwell of her right to be tried by a fair and impartial
p questions, lead to additional cause challenges, or enable the parties to exercise their peremptory challenges in an informed manner. Recently, in Sines, et at v. Kessler, et at, 17-CV-72 (KNM) (W.D. Va.), the civil case brought against the organizers of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville,
ifier: GE CUSP: 369604103 04123113 '.13 23 000 000 21 5700 196,109.08 26.1000 GENERAL MIMS CO COM Dividend Option: Cash Security Identifier: GM CUSP: 37045V100 11118/10 ' 10.988.200 36 4010 399,978.16 31.5100 12109110 ' 86,536.800 36 8160 3.185.969.22 31.5100 Total Noncovered 97,
S,* 140meop mow *a NY 101M Statement Period: 06/0112015 • 06/3012015 Pap 19 of 21 Account Number: Go paperless E Sr". ti, Raid t lloria very Sines 2007 SOUTHERN F I DrErnAL DALOARRATC000MMUNICATIONS rxenurrder CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CPIM. P. 6(e) SDNY_GM_00045930 OB-SDNY-00087
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and Sines

Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Alison J. Nathan
PERSON
Condoleezza Rice
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Oliver Stone
PERSONPease
PERSON
Charlottesville
LOCATIONConrad
PERSONKessler
PERSONPauley
PERSONChristopher Cantwell
PERSONDaugerdas
PERSON
the Ku Klux Klan
ORGANIZATIONthe American Bar Association
ORGANIZATION
Richard Spencer
PERSONCatherine M. Conrad
PERSONJASON ICESSLER
PERSONNORMAN K. MOON
PERSONStanding Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility
ORGANIZATION