Epstein Secrets

v128776550 ilalyy_Gm_00027gtege 2 of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_00138503 EFTA01279112 SUBS Resource Management Account December 2016 Account name: GHISLAINE MA (WELL Friendly account n • I v nn m Account number. Change in the value of your account Summary of gains and losses December 2016 (1) Year t

ohy_Gm_000278O5te 4 of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_00 I 38505 EFTA01279114 *UBS Resource Management Account December 2016 Your assets Account name: GIIISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name:Indy Millennium Account number: Some pnCeS, inCOMe and current vaues ShoNn may I:tent:40,0We. ASS felt*. gains and losses ma

Iles Financial Services Inc Private Wealth Management 299 Park Avenue 25th Floor New York NY 10171.0002 CHF70056271090717Y2Y1 0 Account name: GHIStANE MAXWELL Friendly account nam • I v Mil nnium Account number. Your financial Advisor: SCOTT STACK MANILYLE CASRIEL Phone 212-821.70001800.308-3140 Ques

rivate Wealth Management 299 Park Avenue 25th Floor New York NY 10171.0002 CNP70078411351216X12 YI 0 Resource Management Account December 2016 GHISLAINE MAXWELL P.O. BOX 308 TEANECK NJ 07666-0308 Account name: GfraStANE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Indy. Millennium Account number. Your financial Advis

NP70078411351216X12 YI 0 Resource Management Account December 2016 GHISLAINE MAXWELL P.O. BOX 308 TEANECK NJ 07666-0308 Account name: GfraStANE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Indy. Millennium Account number. Your financial Advisor SCOTT STACK MANILYLE CAST EL Phone 212-821.70001800.308-3140 Que

est income 50.88 2i) 0 Change in rnarkot vat* 533,739.00 Value of your raceme on Dec 30, 2016 $663,739,00 Dec 2015 Noe 201E Dec 2016 SDNY GM 00027882 Member SIPC CNP701I0007641135 NrS0C03I0I36 C0003 1216 030575004 Ng 28776550 1100C0 Page 1 of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_00 138502 EFTA0127911

of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA 00138511 EFTA01279120 Resource Management Account Ti) 'I " 2 -1 - Change in the value of your account Account name: GHISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Indy Millennium Account number. January 2017 Year to date (I) Opening account value 5683,739.00 $683,739.00 Ch

ate rivesanert seo_rities fie Wig deed participation program ad real estate investment tans smarties) and struckned product are genwelk. high toad Carton striared ;rocket, haw not been registered with the Securities and Exan-w Canrassitn or uncle' spy state securities laws. We provide estimated vale

New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (A.IN) Dear Judge Nathan:

rable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (A.IN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in connection with the Court's Order of April 27, 2021, r

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (A.IN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Go

the extent it should be produced, that production is governed by Rule 16, Rule 26.2, Brady, and Giglio, but not Rule 17. See, e.g., United States v. Carton, 17 Cr. 680 (CM), 2018 WL 5818107, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2018) (rejecting a request for a personnel file because the BSF, Dkt. No. 191 at 5 ("Th

rable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: We represent the independent, neutral administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "EVCP").

is "otherwise procurable" or, indeed, already in Ms. Maxwell's possession. See United States v. Pena, No. 15

No. 102)1 2, in Doe v. Indyke, 20 Civ. 484 (S.D.N.Y.). 5° Ex. A ¶ 14 ( Decl.). EFTA00078657 November 19, 2021 Page Thirteen United States v. Carton, No. 17 CR 680 (CM), 2018 WL 5818107, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2018) (quashing subpoena seeking a "forbearance agreement," citing Rule 408). The do

•vit I / 00 nwn 44 15'2 ler . "Zee- e v • ecwry e! v.. 7z To order visit us at: www.clarkeamerlcan.com or ca1.800.355.8123. z a 0 0 SONY GM _00329101 _ EFTA 00201830 EFTA01308375 HOWE TE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION PAYPENTDEDT I. i i rw a N. aye' SP sie re\ a.\ CA i' Cr 4

at 1444463 Duke N 2.244.332 3144.000 1=332 Mutet Spurt (12/31/2004 ram recta mort4444) Dory 3,054400 6.713.616 (3.731424) 750.000 750,000 Carton Signewm Omo. (m be wrigerred Eactuchad At•prie-t) 707.000 - MOM lot IV (VeluerPerocitt it-eluded in Cub flow tom Moneyed Proportica) 444000 (

rable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in connection with the Court's Order of March 24, 2021, reg

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Gove

New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan:

tein, 2017 WL 6887596, at *3. Finally, the Government has standing to challenge subpoenas that call for its own communications. See United States v. Carton, 17 Cr. 680 (CM), 2018 WL 5818107, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2018) (quashing a subpoena for communications with the Government).' The only way for

rable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United Stases v. Chislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in connection with the Court's Order of March 24, 2021, re

, New York 10007 Re: United Stases v. Chislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Gov

tein, 2017 WL 6887596, at *3. Finally, the Government has standing to challenge subpoenas that call for its own communications. See United States v. Carton, 17 Cr. 680 (CM), 2018 WL 5818107, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2018) (quashing a subpoena for communications with the Government).' The only way for

New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Marvel!, S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan:

the extent it should be produced, that production is governed by Rule 16, Rule 26.2, Brady, and Giglio, but not Rule 17. See, e.g., United States v. Carton, 17 Cr. 680 (CM), 2018 WL 5818107, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2018) (rejecting a request for a personnel file because the BSF, Dkt. No. 191 at 5 ("Th