Epstein Secrets

munications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

ng to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters,

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 17 Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

t seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Whatever public documents exist are in the State Court file and equally accessible to Plaintiff. Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Crimi

oe No. 2 Epstein Page 17 Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

munications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

ng to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters,

t seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Whatever public documents exist are in the State Court file and equally accessible to Plaintiff. Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Crimi

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 17 Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

munications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

ng to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters,

t seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Whatever public documents exist are in the State Court file and equally accessible to Plaintiff. Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Crimi

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 17 Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

munications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

ng to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters,

t seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Whatever public documents exist are in the State Court file and equally accessible to Plaintiff. Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Crimi

ung girls were also blocked because Epstein's co-conspirators (i.e., also took the Fifth on every question posed. Other important witnesses (i.e., Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel) evaded depositions. 12. Because of the difficulty of obtaining discovery from Epstein and his co-conspirators, Edwards was force

osed. Other important witnesses (i.e., Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel) evaded depositions. 12. Becau

question posed. Other important witnesses (i.e., Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel) evaded depositions. 12

relevance, burdensomeness, and attorney-client and other privileges regarding the Razorback Creditors' subpoena. Instead, these issues are left to the State Court judge presiding over their case to decide. I. BACKGROUND The procedural background surrounding the Razorback Creditor's motion is important to t

dent of Florida. 13440 This tax was received by GM FAXMakes fax server. For more information, visit

#12 in the case of JANE DOE, a/k/a. JANE DOE NO. 1 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al. Case NO.08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON should it be Returned to EPSTEIN by the State Court, and expedite the duplication of this evidence immediately upon its return, in advance of any Rule 26 conference. EFTA00175478 Case 9:08-cv-86, .