Epstein Secrets

ority of the bars that might be relied upon by Ms Maxwells require the extradition judge to make a finding

ts, a review that formed the basis of changes to the 2003 Extradition Act. (Id. Annex B ¶ 3.1). In Mr. Perry's opinion, it is "highly unlikely that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States" in connection with this case. (Perry Rep. 12(e)). After concluding that none

ide any answer on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by

seding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion2, Ms Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested pers

r, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell II EFTA00093319 cailase:20-agloDacument ntlinfiAtIllf0891, 806E128B2Blage34figrl 3tI 4 Exhibit A EFTA00093320 Ckast.20-U-0003.00dblit DOditrehlei

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00093335 C€aaaAO-NALICII304124It tibeu610012221FROSa2M/f20g fart as522 abrogated on other grounds by

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00066962 abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That bu

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00083758 abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That bu

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00086921 abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That bu

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00093432 abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That bu

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00099916 abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That bu

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00154332 abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That bu

aill)" "Shelle Kaminer 1 E-mail\)" >, "Michael Lemle 1(E-maill)" "Lea Llovio 1(E-maill)" "Anna Malova 1 E-maill)" "Nicole Maurer \(E-mail\)" , "Ghislaine , "Anna Miller \ "Sarah Miller 1(E-maill)" , "Cheryl Pike 1(E- maill)" "Jennifer Post 1(E-maill)" "Lucie Salhany 1(E-mail\)" "Julie Shay 1(E-m

"Michele Dilorenzo 1(E-maill)" , "Cynthia Garrett 1(E-maill)" "Gini Gentry 1(E-maill)" <ginigen earthlink.net> "Karen Hader 1(E-maill)" "Sioux-z Jessup 1(E-maill)" , "Julie Johnson 1(E- maill)" "Shelle Kaminer'(E-maill)" "Shelle Kaminer 1 E-mail\)" >, "Michael Lemle 1(E-maill)" "Lea Llovio 1(E-m

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION AN

he Defendant's burden of production only requires that she "introduce a certain amount of evidence contrary to the presumed fact." United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 380 (1st Cir. 1985), 7 EFTA00013313 --- PAGE BREAK --- abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st

islaine Maxwell."); id. ¶ 77 ("[I]t is highly unlikely that the French government would refuse to issue and execute an extradition decree against Ms Maxwell. . . ."). Nor has the Defendant presented any cases where courts addressed the question of whether an anticipatory waiver of extradition is enforce