Epstein Secrets

and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) .0...... ce ceeeeseeeseeeseeeseeeseeeneeesees 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion in Limine 2)..... 8 3. FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3).................+ 8 4. L

her intervening causes of emotional distress and related damages (Motion in Limine 14) 23 15. Plaintiffs lies about her age and the year she met Mr. Epstein must be exposed to the Jury (Motion in Limine 15)... eee eeeceeseesseeseeesseessecseeesceeseecnseesaeeseeceseeaeesseeeeesseesaees 24 16. All of Plai

laintiffs lies about her age and the year she met Mr. Epstein must be exposed to the Jury (Motion in Limine 15)

v Carvige ing. 526 N.Y 8.20 483 (2d Dept 1988 cos savesowussnsseneesessens smusanssomneasecceeumesvs 35 Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc., 101 F.3d 448, 459-60 (Sth Cir. 1996)... ce ceeceseeeseeseeeseeeseeeseeseeeneeees 10 Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 646-47, 94 S.Ct. 1868, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974). ....... 3

for crime victims has arisen - specifically, the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case before a federal court in Florida. In that case, girls victimized by Epstein have argued that they should have been consulted about a federal nonprosecution agreement; Department attorneys have responded that because prosecuto

Congress sought to end that suffering by making victims meaningful participants in criminal cases. 3° C. AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE PRE-CHARGING ISSUE: THE JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE Grven the potentially expansive scope of victims' rights under both state provisions and the CVRA, a critical question arises about how to appl

e Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the Courts, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 689, 693 (2002). 6 527 F.3d 391 (Sth Cir. 2008). Other aspects of the case are discussed in Paul G. Cassell & Steven Joffee, The Crime Victims' Expanding Role in a System of Public Prosecutio

en prosecutors and defense because prosecutor had not consulted with victim in violation of 1/8 U.S.C. § 3771). 8 See In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 395 (Sth Cir. 2008) (acknowledging lower court's interpretation of § 3771(a) before any prosecution is underway); Does v. United States, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 1342

Defining the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 666, 46 Colum. JE. & Soc. Probs. 207, 237-45 (2012) (arguing for br