Epstein Secrets

08CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPORTIN COMES NOW, Intervener,.. and files s Response endant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 documen

RCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381A)OC STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, ■. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

09454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPO

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any

on for review of the order granting the stay. *4 On August 26, 1999, this Court denied both the Former Husband's and the Guardian's motions. FNS. The Notice of Appearance filed by the attorney stated she appeared "on behalf of the Guardian." A Notice of Appearance was also filed by the Guardian "on behalf of the mi

all those conditions you two have agreed to? MS. BELOHLAVEK: Yes, Your Honor. MR. GOLDBERGER: With the court's amendments, yes. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein, do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma'am. THE COURT: I need the defendant to 14 sign number D where I had an a added to 15 victim, and G,

Z.= TO REORDER CALL 9546/49599 EFTA00180769 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty _1S Case No. Charge Count Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring

tkido by them. . Instructed byt op/07.02.08 Superela& Moor pbfeackt jagt 7 of 8 Form Itovike 034 tiet EFTA00180788 11/LO/Zdtlti 333 ,a4g2 JEFFILEY EPSTEIN CASE(1302008CF009381A.XXX148 • COURT °BMW PA'YMZIff$ • • • ▪ • • • • . . l••111,AI. I •IT\olkl•ILI "Vom Wen sms • . . • ' i . .

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty _1S Case No. Charge Coun

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

: With the court's amendments, yes. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein, do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma'am.

on for review of the order granting the stay.1Pe On August 26, 1999, this Court denied both the Former Husband's and the Guardian's motions. PN5. The Notice of Appearance filed by the attorney stated she appeared "on behalf of the Guardian." A Notice of Appearance was also filed by the Guardian "on behalf of the mi

4AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY INTERVENER'S AND S ON TO STAY OF LAW COMES NOW, Intervener, M. and fil 's Response ndant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 26 Southern District of Florida for. any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 docume

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 26 Southern District of Florida for. any

IRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, M. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

ion for review of the order granting the stay.** On August 26, 1999, this Court denied both the Former Husband's and the Guardian's motions. PN5. The Notice of Appearance filed by the attorney stated she appeared "on behalf of the Guardian." A Notice of Appearance was also filed by the Guardian "on behalf of the mi