Epstein Secrets

Best, From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda March 24, 2011 4:45 PM Co: (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Epstein -- DOJ letter to defense . (USAFLS); Can we make this letter public? I don't think so, but wanted to check with you. This would put to rest some o

y Epstein. In case # 08-CV-80736, attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and #2 are challenging the validity of the federal NPA, worked out between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's criminal attorneys before he pled guilty to his state charges. Basically, the attorneys for Doe 1 and 2 are saying the USAO did not notify the vict

); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS); (USAFLS) RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URG

To: Cc: Subject: RE: (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:35 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); EFTA00206395 Suggest deleting first sentence (since we are kind of responding) The U.S. Attorney's Office will file its response to th

y Epstein. In case # 08-CV-80736, attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and #2 are challenging the validity of the federal NPA, worked out between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's criminal attorneys before he pled guilty to his state charges. Basically, the attorneys for Doe 1 and 2 are saying the USAO did not notify the vict

ted because of it. They also allege in the motion that the USAO agreed to keeping the NPA secret (it was originally sealed) because of pressure from Epstein's attorneys and higher ups in the Justice Dept. I'm reaching out to you for a response to the court filing. I am on deadline with the story. Thank

). Monday, March 21, 2011 5:36 PM (USAFLS) RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URG

From: Sent: Monda To: Cc: Subject: RE: (USAFLS) ). Monday, March 21, 2011 5:36 PM (USAFLS) RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:33 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGE

ttorney Jay Lefkowitz on December 13, 2007 protesting charges of misconduct on your part and laying out several details about your interactions with Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Your co-signer, Alex Accosta, has already acknowledged the vaiidity of this letter, but I would also like you to confirm that it came f

ntact us99999 I did not fail to call her back, I referred the matter to you. Can you please handle this. Making clear that all allegations raised by Epstein's team were investigated by DOJ and found to be completely meritless. You might also add that Epstein had previously made false allegations against

(USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein prosecution -CONTACT FROM NEWSWEEK I und

, March 21, 2011 5:53 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); That's fine with me. EFTA00206400

forwarding. From: (USAFLS) ‹ > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 5:57 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT No, although I might feel different if it were a pleading. And then again, I might not. From: (USAFLS

Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT No,

(USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URG

a March 21, 2011 5:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT . (USAFLS);IMI . (USAFLS); Too late.... Went out. I don't think it's worth resending, do you? I will correct for future use. From: (USAFLS) Sen

y Epstein. In case # 08-CV-80736, attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and #2 are challenging the validity of the federal NPA, worked out between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's criminal attorneys before he pled guilty to his state charges. Basically, the attorneys for Doe 1 and 2 are saying the USAO did not notify the vict

ted because of it. They also allege in the motion that the USAO agreed to keeping the NPA secret (it was originally sealed) because of pressure from Epstein's attorneys and higher ups in the Justice Dept. I'm reaching out to you for a response to the court filing. I am on deadline with the story. Thank

nda 21, 2011 4:52 PM To: , (USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Hi There's been a new court filing in W

, March 21, 2011 5:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); EFTA00206414

en forwarding. From: (USAFLS)c Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 5:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT .(USAFLS); It just occurred to me that perhaps we should not refer to the Jane Does as plaintiffs sinc

Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT .(U

(USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URG

, March 21, 2011 5:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT .(USAFLS); It just occurred to me that perhaps we should not refer to the Jane Does as plaintiffs since there is no independent civil action, just

: Cc: Subject: Ok - will send out now. From: Sent: Monda To: (USAFLS) < > Monday, March 21, 2011 5:54 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); (USAFLS) . (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:53 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFL

4 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (US

2011 5:54 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URG

: Sent: Monda To: (USAFLS) < > Monday, March 21, 2011 5:54 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); (USAFLS) . (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:53 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading