http://www.palmbeachdailynews.com Cox Conserves. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Contents of this e-mail may be confidential and proprietary. Use discretion when forwarding. From: (USAFLS) ‹ > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 5:57 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT No, although I might feel different if it were a pleading. And then again, I might not. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monda March 21, 2011 5:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT . (USAFLS);IMI . (USAFLS); Too late.... Went out. I don't think it's worth resending, do you? I will correct for future use. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monc March 21, 2011 5:54 PM To: ,M (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT It just occurred to me that perhaps we should not refer to the Jane Does as plaintiffs since there is no independent civil action, just a motion in a miscellaneous proceeding. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monda , March 21, 2011 5:53 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) EFTA00206412