To: Cc: Subject: RE: (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:35 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); EFTA00206395 Suggest deleting first sentence (since we are kind of responding) The U.S. Attorney's Office will file its response to th

From: Sent: Monda To: Cc: Subject: RE: (USAFLS) ). Monday, March 21, 2011 5:36 PM (USAFLS) RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:33 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGE

, March 21, 2011 5:53 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); That's fine with me. EFTA00206400

a March 21, 2011 5:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT . (USAFLS);IMI . (USAFLS); Too late.... Went out. I don't think it's worth resending, do you? I will correct for future use. From: (USAFLS) Sen

, March 21, 2011 5:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); EFTA00206414

, March 21, 2011 5:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT .(USAFLS); It just occurred to me that perhaps we should not refer to the Jane Does as plaintiffs since there is no independent civil action, just

: Sent: Monda To: (USAFLS) < > Monday, March 21, 2011 5:54 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS); RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT (USAFLS); (USAFLS) . (USAFLS) March 21, 2011 5:53 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading