Epstein Secrets

-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232,

09/17/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 0940469, 09-80581, 09-80656, 0940802, 09-81092.

d as Exhibit 1. 5. Some 13 days later, counsel for Jane Doe No. 4 flied a motion for protective order on September 9, 2009 attempting to prohibit MrEpstein's presence at the deposition. The Defendant immediately filed a response (an Emergency Motion) on September II, 2009 requesting that the coon enter

been justified, however, under these circumstances, it was grandstanding and improper. In that the Plaintiff has stated that she voluntary went to JE's home 50 plus times without trauma until she filed a lawsuit, this brief visual encounter from a distance should not have resulted in the unilater

Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 4 of 33 Page 4 the plaintiffs either directly or indirectly. However, there is no prohibition against Mr. F.pstein's attendance at a deposition where, as is reflected in the order, the communication wilt be made to the plaintiff solely through defense counsel wi

LORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACFI hereby Se that. On. day, hefoie me, an ACC* &if itithoiiiid to oaths and take ac/cnowledgmener, personally appeared Jeffrey E. Bpetein known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who wrimowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that

09-00419, 0940581, 0940656, 09-80802, 0941092. Defendant Epstein's Emergency Motion To Strike Plaintiff's Motion F

s the intent of the Court to give the Defendant, Mr. Epstein, and his attorney an opportunity to have this Co

-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 0

recognizes a strong public right of access to documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. Sec Sarasota Herald Tribune, Div. See, et, Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008); D

ercial sex act. Page 2 of 9 EFTA00182943 CT DATE(S) DEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 9 November 2004 - March 2005 --a N EPSTEIN ..NEPSTEIN Jane Doe #14 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(aX1) and 2 Knowingly, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, recruiting, enticing, providing, and obtaini

ravel to 358 El Brillo Way so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 27. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to accomplish the purpose and

ments to be made to, minor females in exchange for engaging in lewd conduct. EPSTEIN, (c) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY a/k/a ," and other participants would ask females to recruit other minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (d)

the public association of their identities with Defendant Epstein and these assaults. 3. Dr. Gilbert Kliman,2 a w

ober 28, 2006 132. Lawrence LE, Viron M, Johnson JE, Hudkins A, Samples G, Kliman G: A school-based m

SISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 52 EFTA00182941 INDICTMENT SUMMARY CT DATE(S) kEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 1 2001 - October 2005 NEPSTEIN Jane Does 1-19 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2 Conspiracy to use a facility or means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, or entice minors to enga

ecognizes a strong public right of access to documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. See Sarasota Herald Tribune Div. See, e.g., Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla, 2008). Doe No, 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008): Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);

in the above matter. I have prepared a proposed Order, which I believe accurately reflects your ruling at the hearing on June 26, 2009 on Defendant Jeffrey Epstcin's Motion to Stay Disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum Pending Review. By copy of this letter, I am providing all counsel of recor

rt considers in connection with sentencing. Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div See. e.g.. Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein. Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 4._vinstein, Case No. 08-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2

tial. The only matter before the court today was Defendant Epstein's Motion for a Stay which the court denied. Cont

effrey Epstein Dear Judge Colbath: On behalf of Mr. Epstein, we strongly object to the proposed order submitt

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS OVERNIGHT MAIL The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath Fifteenth Judicial Circuit-Palm Beach P

w recognizes a strong public right of access to documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div See. e.g.. Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein. Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);