Epstein Secrets

Text: TO CLARIFY SENTENCE TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR FILED BY JACK GOLDBERGER 7 1AGOR - AGREED ORDER Filing Date: 04-MAY-2009 Filing Party: JEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (JUDGE COLBATH) THAT THE ORDER OF COMMUNITY CONTROL IS CORRECTED TO DELETE SPECIAL CONDITION #26 AND

rd parties" and identifies those third parties as Mr. Epstein's co- conspirators. (Petition at 15). Again, Mr.

STER AS A SEXUAL OFFENDER W/IN 48 HRS OF RELEASE. DNA SWAB. MER 2 A 1GUIL - JUDGMENT OF GUILTY Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 'Disposition Amount: Docket Text: none. 2 B FNGR - FINGERPRINTS Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount:

UNTIL NOON ON THURSDAY 02-JUL-2009. MOTION TO COMPEL THE DEFT TO POST BOND - DENIED. 25 J MOT - MOTION Filing Date: 26-JUN-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN JEFFREY E ,I.Disposition Amount: http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dIctrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 EFTA00233648 - Not

and other non-parties') motions. The Court found that the documents had not properly been sealed in the first instance and further denied Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential dated June 11, 2009. 2 EFTA00233652 07/20/Z009 15:23 FAX 5618059846 USA0 WPB CONFRM 07-20-'09 14:22 F

E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: SET CASE FOR 6/30/08 @ 8:30 AM FOR STATUS CHECK EVHLD - EVENT HELD Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: VEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: CR-DAMES. PLEAD & ADJ GUILTY AS CHARGED. STIP/FOUND: SEXUAL OFFENDER. PBCJ 6 MOS W/CD FOR 1 DAY, TO R

a sound legal and factual basis." Admin. Or. 15th Jud. Or. Fla. 2.303. 5. The Post also is entitled to fees and costs in this matter pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 9.410, which gives appellate courts discretion to impose sanctions if an appeal "presents no justiciable question and is so devoid of merit on the face o

and other non-parties') motions. The Court found that the documents had not properly been sealed in the first instance and further denied Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential dated June 11, 2009. 2 09112/2019 Page CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331698

411 SDNY_GM_00331699 EFTA 00204425 EFTA02729410 07.'20-'09 14:39 FROM-THOMAS & LOCICERO 8139843070 T-120 P005/007 F-937 6. In this case, Mr. Epstein's certiorari petition — like his initial filing of these documents under seal and his June 11, 2009 Motion to Make Court Records Confidential —was

39843070 T-120 P005/007 F-937 6. In this case, Mr. Epstein's certiorari petition — like his initial filing o

FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PAL

a sound legal and factual basis." Admin. Or. 151° Jud. Cir. Fla. 2.303. 5. The Post also is entitled to fees and costs in this matter pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 9.410, which gives appellate courts discretion to impose sanctions if an appeal "presents no justiciable question and is so devoid of merit on the face o

and other non-parties') motions. The Court found that the documents had not properly been sealed in the first instance and further denied Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential dated June 11, 2009. 09112/2019 2 Pae CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331776 E

rief. 09/12/2079 3 Page 3514 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331777 EFTA 00204503 EFTA02729488 6. In this case, Mr. Epstein's certiorari petition — like his initial filing of these documents under seal and his June 11, 2009 Motion to Make Court Records Confidential — was

FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PAL

EFTA 00204503 EFTA02729488 6. In this case, Mr. Epstein's certiorari petition — like his initial filing o

a sound legal and factual basis." Admin. Or. 15th Jud. Cir. Fla. 2.303. 5. The Post also is entitled to fees and costs in this matter pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 9.410, which gives appellate courts discretion to impose sanctions if an appeal "presents no justiciable question and is so devoid of merit on the face o