Epstein Secrets

vision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear• Mr. Menthe': July 25, 2007 Jeffiry Epstein TELEPHONE la 1E)7370400 m ailman We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or sho

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

.S.C. §2422(b) could or should be brought against Jeffrey Epstein, even assuming the specific conduct that

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports

for new trial denied. 2422(b; 2423(b); 2421; 2252(a)(1); 2252(a)( I ) & (aX5)(B); 2256; 1512(b)(1)& (b)(2)(A) No Information D. Conn. U.S. v. Kufrovich, 997 F. Supp. 246 (D. Conn. 1997) No Information No information available but indicated use of telephone, intemet and mail he-trial motions. C

RENA FAITH BY HAND of of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern Distri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or should b

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the s

istri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have pr

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports

for new trial denied. 2422(b; 24230)); 2421; 2252(a)(1); 2252(a)(1) & (a)(5)(B); 2256; 1512(b)(1)& (b)(2)(A) No Information D. Conn. U.S. v. Kufrovich, 997 F. Supp. 246 (D. Conn. 1997) No Information No information available but indicated use of telephone, Internet and mail Pre-trial motions.

m: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:49 AM To: Menthe', Matthew (USAFLS) Cc: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi Matt - I had hoped to have a revised indictment for our discussion today but Mr. Black's motion has demanded my immediate attention. However, i

ested him. Sentence 13 months; appealed conviction & sentence. Affirmed. CHARG 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART A nationwide search of all cases listing charges under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) underscores the undeniable fact th

ummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART

issue certificate of appealability and entered judgment for respondent. 2422(b) Not Consummated Attempted to show up for meeting Sting U.S. I Kufrovich, 997 F. Supp. 246 (D. Conn. 1997) No Information No information available but indicated use of telephone, intemet and mail. Indictment not acc

4. A CNN.com - Sandy Berger to plead guilty on documents charge - Apr I, 2005 (http://edition.am.com/2005/LAW/04/01/berger.plea0 15. na b Smith, is Jeffrey, Berger Case Still Roils Archives, Justice Dept., Washington Post, February 21, 2007 (http://www.washingtonpost.cotn/svp-dyn/content/article/2007/02

4 • Not Reported in F.Supp.2d Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2003 WL 22118983 (D.N.D.) (Cite as: Not Reported in F.Supp.2d) The United States cites Kufrovich for the basic principle that the judge instructs the jury on the law; therefore the judge will instruct the jury on whether a sexual act violates