Epstein Secrets

Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:20 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Let's talk before this is sent, please. From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:45 PM To: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)

nk? Hi Jeff and Mau — I just want to again voice my disagreement with promising to have a meeting or having a meeting with Lefcourt or any other of Epstein's attorneys. As I mentioned, this is not a case where we will be sitting down to negotiate whether a defendant will serve one year versus two years

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Let's talk before this is sent, please.

ady raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with Andy and myself. Those reasons are: (1) he wants the Petit policy to trump our ability to prosecute Epstein, (2) this shouldn't be a federal offense, and (3) the victims were willing participants so the crim

k? Hi Jeff and Matt — I just want to again voice my disagreement with promising to have a meeting or having a meeting with Lefcourt or any other of Epstein's attorneys. As I mentioned, this is not a case where we will be sitting down to negotiate whether a defendant will serve one year versus two years

te 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda 007 6:33 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-8076-CV-MARRA P-013526 EFTA00230431

.(USAFLS) Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:45 PM FW: Jeffrey Epstein Karen — What do you think? Hi Jeff and

already raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with and myself. Those reasons are: (1) he wants the Petit policy to trump our ability to prosecute Epstein, (2) this shouldn't be a federal offense, and (3) the victims were willing participants so the crim

ent: Tuesda Ma 22 2007 6:33 PM To: Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00226643

From: Sent: To: Subject: IS1 just want to again voice my disagreement with promising to have a meeting or having a urt or any other of Epstein's attorneys. As I mentioned, this is not a case where we will be sitting down to negotiate whether a defendant will serve one year versus two years

Part of our prosecution strategy was already disclosed at the last meeting, and I am concerned that more will be disclosed at a future meeting. : Jeitrey Epstein PM u think? My co-chair, , who has prosecuted more of these cases than the rest of us combinedianclaAcho , also opposes a meeting. We have been

ady raised in his letter (which is part of the indictment package) and during his meeting with Andy and myself. Those reasons are: (I) he wants the Petit policy to trump our ability to prosecute Epstein, (2) this shouldn't be a federal offense, and (3) the victims were willing participants so the crim

- Page lbw 1 1(;) (65 .." 6 1. Amount ~MN 60%4 - -FIG, k 1 3 3 xu.. Totol lo DM* ta C.SI 63 14- 861,1 3 a- 112 Note ~aka CONFIDENTIAL JE SDNY_GM_02766825 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00253633 EFTA01335652 Asp_ i all ti Area Ma Aim.! Ak

at Le . \./ '")) le _ ‘12 I. ,I .-Mc I/ f3 mi 14, 4..itA . SI& ,3%, 051.40 Aavia: tA to et -ft-LW g.)"...`r; Inv Oca-t-s4: 411 ma" T1t Petit, sncot 4WTOVSIV•CIA: tattooist f5ribilbo • co rut", 1 se livio - 1 2 ...t GO I .- I-101 '.7.,;°,7 41 . - MNIP-Ssi lit fin iiI- • in Wt' (F, e