Epstein Secrets

bus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response in Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no rights under 18 U.S.C. 3177(a)(5) since that provision does not apply where there are no "court proceed

Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: In accordance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, on June 30, 2008, the United States Attorney's Office provided

lian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: In accordance with

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f

us, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response in Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no rights under 18 U.S.C. 3177(a)(5) since that provision does not apply where there are no "court proceedi

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f

bus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response in Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no rights under 18 U.S.C. 3177(a)(5) since that provision does not apply where there are no "court proceedi

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f

bus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response In Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no rights under 18 U.S.C. 3177(a)(5) since that provision does not apply where there are no "court proceed

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f